tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post2637320300397369476..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: What is the Scientific Worldview?Glenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-48877105713257611632023-07-24T11:04:05.057-07:002023-07-24T11:04:05.057-07:00How does this information refute the Einstein Tire...How does this information refute the Einstein Tired Light Theory? 26.7 Billion Years is a long way from infinity? From my understanding is your theory proven correct if the age of the universe is older to the point of a number near infinity and/or if the age keeps increasing to the point that the Einstein Theory calculations do not compute? Please excuse my ignorance. <br /><br />Respectfully,Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10896633952454011451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-131081269526324462015-11-13T00:52:26.019-08:002015-11-13T00:52:26.019-08:00I read your blog.I thought it was great.. Hope you...I read your blog.I thought it was great.. Hope you have a great day. God bless.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.imarksweb.org" rel="nofollow">Rica</a><br />www.imarksweb.org<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03983279751843228358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-52784649361815781622015-08-05T14:03:28.459-07:002015-08-05T14:03:28.459-07:00I think the eternal universe makes sense. How coul...I think the eternal universe makes sense. How could nothing explode?Chastity White Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17584399790745891849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-74843237914294894272012-11-06T11:07:08.783-08:002012-11-06T11:07:08.783-08:00Christina:
Thanks for the comment. Hope you get t...Christina:<br /><br />Thanks for the comment. Hope you get the chance to read "The Scientific Worldview.” You are right that univironmental determinism is similar to systems philosophy, particularly in its concerns for parts and wholes. There is, however, a major difference. In UD, microcosms always have macrocosms of equal importance. The Big Bang Theory, for example, is the archetype of systems philosophy, while Infinite Universe Theory is the archetype of univironmental determinism. UD assumes that the universe is microcosmically and macrocosmically infinite. In addition, we define matter as that which takes up xyz dimensions and contains other matter. We would not dream of spending time on more than three dimensions.Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-82176117974515541362012-11-05T06:23:23.067-08:002012-11-05T06:23:23.067-08:00univironmental determinism sounds very much like G...univironmental determinism sounds very much like General Systems Theory which was developed by Ludwig von Bertalanffy. I also like Arthur Koestler's coinage of the term 'holon' to express the characteristics of all systems as both parts and wholes. In fact I relied heavily on the General Systems Theory in developing the ideas contained in my book "THE SHORT RANGE ANTIGRAVITATIONAL FORCE AND THE HIERARCHICALLY STRATIFIED SPACETIME GEOMETRY IN 12 DIMENSIONS" Christina Anne Knight cknight29@cox.netchristina anne knightnoreply@blogger.com