tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post7588836555028468520..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Does dark matter and dark energy prove Einstein wrong?Glenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-15503507177766981302019-08-22T15:44:15.923-07:002019-08-22T15:44:15.923-07:00Now, here’se the thing. Pretty simple reasoning. P...Now, here’se the thing. Pretty simple reasoning. Pay attention:<br /><br />If there was an aether, it would mean that over 90% of the universe would be made of invisible, undetectable, non-baryonic, omnipresent mass-equivalent. That cannot be, because 90% portion of the universe is dark matter and dark energy, which is invisible, undetectable, non-baryonic and omnipresent mass-equivalent.<br /><br />Also, if there was an aether present on a very large scale, it’s mass would significantly distort the spiral motion of galaxies, to the point that such a motion would be unexplainable under Newton’s law of gravity. Of course, the spiral motion of galaxies are unexplainable under Newton’s law of gravity, but that is because of dark matter which is present on a very large scale. Everybody knows that.<br /><br />Oh, and by the way: if there was an aether, light and other EM radiation that crisscrosses the entire universe would inevitably interact with it, thereby heating it to a theoretical blackbody temperature of about 2,8K. Sure enough, the entire universe does radiate at a 2,8K blackbody temperature, but that is the remnants of the Big Bang event, which is an incontrovertible, recorded and historical fact.<br /><br />Not to forget that such an interaction between light and aether would cause said light to loose some of its energy, thereby shifting its frequency towards the red end of the spectrum, in proportion to its distance travelled. Incidentally, all EM radiation reaching us from very distant galaxies is indeed red-shifted in proportion to its distance travelled, but that is because the universe is expanding. <br /><br />QED.<br /><br />That kind of reminds me of that historian who spent his entire life trying to prove that the Iliad was not written by Homer, but by some other Greek also named Homer.Pierrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01689111102277765466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-39965627430713925112019-06-23T20:38:06.424-07:002019-06-23T20:38:06.424-07:00Thanks Bill:
Remember that according to my ADT (A...Thanks Bill:<br /><br />Remember that according to my ADT (Aether Deceleration Theory) [Borchardt, Glenn, 2018, The Physical Cause of Gravitation: viXra:1806.0165.], decelerated aether particles are entrained around every microcosm in the same way that our atmosphere is entrained around Earth. That would be true of the Milky Way. Remember that, unlike the solar system, very little of the mass of the Milky Way exists in its nucleus (99% for the Sun vs. <1% for the Milky Way nucleus). In other words, the inverse square law holds only for a point. When the mass of a vortex is spread out over a large area, the gravitational effects of the various aetherospheres will be spread out over an equally large area.Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-24584455643401254242019-06-23T09:46:35.472-07:002019-06-23T09:46:35.472-07:00I agree that the search for Dark Matter is an exam...I agree that the search for Dark Matter is an example of ‘Theoretical Physicists Gone Wild’. I also believe that aether must exist because light is a wave and waves must travel through a medium. If Dark Matter is just aether particles, and they tend to be more concentrated around matter objects like galaxies, then what is your explanation for the flattening of stellar rotation curves? <br /><br />To clarify: If Newton’s Universal Law of Gravity is universal, these rotation curves should fall-off with distance from the galactic center. If aether particles concentrate around galaxies, it seems to me these rotation curves would rise in the opposite direction to what Newton predicts. What the data shows, however, is that they tend to flat-line with distance from the galactic center in a way that suggests equilibrium to me.Bill Howellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01893569000316310311noreply@blogger.com