tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post8854702681679193016..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Cause of paradigmatic persistenceGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-26807624175254541622016-11-02T11:10:41.625-07:002016-11-02T11:10:41.625-07:00Egads! Chopra rides again! Bligh, I had no idea of...Egads! Chopra rides again! Bligh, I had no idea of how much of an immaterialist you were. In other words, “AE's "immaterial fields"…are only concrete realities as fleeting states of human consciousness.” Wow! At least that fits right in with your concept of “matterless motion” and its violation of the Fourth Assumption of Science, inseparability (Just as there is no motion without matter, so there is no matter without motion). <br /><br />Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-20971908446693114052016-11-02T10:07:12.649-07:002016-11-02T10:07:12.649-07:00I don't know the context of AE's "imm...I don't know the context of AE's "immaterial fields" but he was correct, of course. <br />"Fields" are abstract ideas about how the universal material universe works!<br />Those "ideas" are only concrete realities as fleeting states of human consciousness. Hardly anyone seems to recognize this.Blighhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10160829900151513063noreply@blogger.com