PSI Blog 20201026
Untired Light Theory and Regressive Attempts to Support It
The reason the Big
Bang Theory is hanging on so long is not because of any data the regressives
have accumulated. It is entirely how those data are interpreted. Thanks to Jesse
Witwer for asking my opinion on this enduring use of Einstein’s Untired Light
Theory:
"Tired-Light" Hypothesis
Gets Re-Tired
Whether light was a particle,
a wave, or an idiotic combination of both, it would be impossible for it to
travel over cosmic distances without losing energy. The only way that could
happen is for space to be perfectly empty, as assumed by Einstein and his idealistic followers.
They claim: “For the
tired-light theory to be correct, young galaxies would have
to be dimmer, rather than brighter, than old ones.” Ask yourself: How much
sense does that make? Furthermore, how much sense does perfectly empty space
make?
As usual, regressives
hold fast to their religiously based assumptions and are wont to emit
borderline insults to nonbelievers: ‘Even so, "I don't think it's possible
to convince people who are holding on to tired light," says Ned Wright, an
astrophysicist at the University of California, Los Angeles. "I would say
it is more a problem for a psychological journal than for Science."’
Maybe they should
publish their Untired Light Theory stuff in religious journals.