PSI Blog 20210830 Water pressure vs aether pressure
Abhi asks:
“It has
always been observed that objects with densities greater than that of water
sink in water and objects with densities less than that of water float on
water. This means that water has a tendency to push objects with densities
greater than itself towards the baryonic matter on which the water is placed
and also a tendency to push objects with densities less than itself away from
the baryonic matter on which the water is placed. Can you explain why water has
such tendencies?”
[GB: Thanks, Abhi for an easy one. Remember that the
direction a microcosm (i.e., “object”) moves is determined by the univironment.
In this case, we can be concerned mostly with the macrocosm, that is, the
supermicrocosms that tend to collide with a particular microcosm. The heavy
object is pushed toward the center of Earth by highly active water molecules
and aether particles. The light object is pushed toward the surface of the
water by highly active, massive water molecules that produce collisions whose
F=ma is greater than the F=ma of the countervailing collisions produced by tiny
aether particles.
Another way of looking at this phenomenon is with Newton’s
First Law of Motion. A microcosm is accelerated when a supermicrocosm collides
with it; and decelerated when that microcosm collides with another
supermicrocosm. This may appear a bit complicated because the pressure in water
(baryonic matter) increases toward Earth because it is pushed toward Earth by
highly active aether particles during gravitation. The pressure in the aether medium
increases away from Earth as we surmised in our explanation of the Pound-Rebka
experiment.[1]
EM waves moving away from Earth traveled faster than those traveling toward
Earth. Because of the slightly increased velocity, the waves were redshifted
(further apart).[2]
This implies short-range aether particle motion was greater as well. Having
higher velocities means the force (F=ma) engendered by each particle was
greater also, revealing that aetherial pressure increased with distance from
Earth (collisions per cm2). Once those aether particles collide with
baryonic matter, they decelerate, producing a low-pressure halo containing “dark
matter” around baryonic matter.[3] This
is both a result of gravitation and a cause for further gravitation since all
microcosms tend to move from high to low pressure areas.
Baryonic matter, which is simply complexed aether particles,
moves similarly, but with the more massive microcosms crowding out the less
massive ones. Many types of wood and other “lighter” microcosms are no match
for heavy water molecules. These provide more force to their Earthward sides,
causing them to float despite the relatively meagre impacts of the nitrogen, oxygen,
and aether particles above them.
I like this explanation because it removes the contradiction
posed by Newton’s gravitational attraction hypothesis. One could naively ask:
If everything is “pulled” toward Earth, how come the wooden object floating on
the water is not pulled likewise. You also could ask Einstein why his perfectly
empty space-time doesn’t do a better job on the wooden object.]
[1] Borchardt, Glenn, and Puetz, S.J., 2012,
Neomechanical gravitation theory, in Volk, Greg, Proceedings of the
Natural Philosophy Alliance, 19th Conference of the NPA, 25-28 July:
Albuquerque, NM, Natural Philosophy Alliance, Mt. Airy, MD, v. 9, p. 53-58 [10.13140/RG.2.1.3991.0483].
[2] Note that Pound and Rebka used the old “time dilation”
trope to explain this. Time is motion and cannot dilate.
