PSI Blog 20240909 When will cosmogonists
discard the Big Bang Theory?
This short video is a good explanation of the current Big
Bang Theory (the ɅCDM Model, which includes
nonexistent dark energy (Ʌ) and dark matter (DM)) and the “elderly galaxies”
problem.
Photo credit: The
Secrets Of The Universe, on Facebook.com.
Here are a couple good questions from George Coyne:
“Glenn.
Before the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of
early galaxies, the Big Bang Theory (BBT) was asserting that star formation
took hundreds of millions of years post BBT to begin forming and galaxies took
one billion years to form. But this BBT prediction has been completely
invalidated by the JWST images.
Although the creators of this video titled "Webb is
Already Breaking Cosmology" support the Big Bang Theory, the narrator
states some estimates by astronomers suggest that the JWST could see as far as
a redshift of 26, just 120 million years after the Big Bang.
My serious question for you is: If the JWST finds
galaxies with billions of stars within the first 100,000 years of the Big Bang,
which is ten thousand times less than a billion, would that be sufficient
evidence to get astronomers to consider the possibility that the BBT could be
wrong? Is there any time frame after the BBT in which the existence of mature
galaxies discovered by the JWST would lead its proponents to question its
validity?”
Just months into observations, Webb is already
breaking cosmology!
[GB: Thanks, George, for another of the many videos
timidly challenging the Big Bang Theory. The narrator does a wonderful job of
explaining the theory in less than 10 minutes. Unfortunately, despite his hysterical headlines, he
has swallowed all the propaganda hook, line, and sinker. He did miss emphasizing the most
important proclamation of the theory: that as we look back into the universe,
we are supposed to see younger and younger cosmological objects. Instead, all
his illustrations are similar to our nearby universe, just as Infinite Universe
Theory predicted. Above all, those “Elderly Galaxies” at the limit of
observation are not supposed to be there.
Also, those so-called “predictions” concerning the
evolution and abundance of elements heavier than helium are better explained by
Infinite Universe Theory. Those elements are formed in huge
elderly stars billions of years old as a result of things coming together, not
exploding apart. Even our own 4.603-billion-year-old Sun does not produce them.
When will cosmogonists cry “uncle” and give up the
greatest travesty known to “modern” physics? Just as soon as they become
cosmologists instead of cosmogonists (those who assume the universe had a
beginning). My prediction of 2050 still stands. That is because the fundamental
assumptions underlying what amounts to the “Last Creation Myth” are essentially
religious. And you know how difficult it is for a true believer to give that
up. With that affliction affecting over 80% of US scientists as well as the
rest of the world, it looks like the current spate of
irrationality will last at least for another generation. The switch from finity to infinity
will change everything, but that occurs one person, one video, and one Blog
post at a time.]
PSI Blog 20240909
Thanks for reading
Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive
new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.” There you
can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your
questions.