20250602

Another “Elderly Galaxy” Supports Infinite Universe Theory

PSI Blog 20250602 Another “Elderly Galaxy” Supports Infinite Universe Theory

 

According to the Big Bang Theory, galaxy MoM-z14 has a calculated age of 280 million years judged by its redshift of z = 14.44, which correlates with the distance light has traveled.

Data from the previous record holder: “Scientists used NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope’s NIRSpec (Near-Infrared Spectrograph) to obtain a spectrum of the distant galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 in order to accurately measure its redshift and therefore determine its age. The redshift can be determined from the location of a critical wavelength known as the Lyman-alpha break. This galaxy dates back to less than 300 million years after the big bang.”

 

Thanks to George Coyne for this heads up:

 

“Glenn,

 

The JWST [James Webb Space Telescope] recently discovered this fully formed galaxy as it appeared 280 million years after the hypothesized Big Bang. The article does not mention how many hundreds of millions of years would have been required to reach its observed size. If it needed more than 280 million years to reach its observed size, then it must have started forming before the Big Bang occurred. How is that possible? Here is the link to the article.

 

https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy/previously-unimaginable-james-webb-telescope-breaks-its-own-record-again-discovering-farthest-known-galaxy-in-the-universe

 

[GB: Thanks George. How is that possible? It isn’t. As we look farther and farther out, we are supposed to see younger and younger objects. The light from the new record holder would have taken almost 13.8 billion years to get here. But what we see at the maximum distance are galaxies similar to our own Milky Way that took over 13.6 billion years to form. There is no way MoM-14z could have formed in 280 million years. As I pointed out before, the accepted 13.8-billion-year age of the Big Bang universe is based on dubious assumptions and math that allows no greater age than 13.8 billion years. The “Elderly Galaxy” problem is No. 9 in my list of 25 disproofs of the Big Bang Theory. When that list was prepared, the youngest “Elderly Galaxy” was 450 million years old. They get these bogus young ages by using Friedmann’s math. Here is a bit from Perplexity AI:

 

“Redshift and Cosmic Expansion

  

Redshift Type

Example

Redshift (z)

Time After Big Bang

Observable Galaxies

JADES-GS-z14-0

14.32

290 million years

CMB

Cosmic Microwave Background

~1100

380,000 years

Theoretical Limit

Near Big Bang singularity

t→0


In summary, while observations are limited by the opacity of the early universe and detection capabilities, the Friedmann equations governing the Big Bang model permit redshifts approaching infinity as a then→0 1,2.”

 

There will be more of these supposed baby galaxies looking elderly. You can see why Hawking’s finite singularity was needed to do the math. It also was needed for cosmogony apologists to avoid the ridiculous idea the universe exploded out of nothing. And for the  misinterpretation that the universe is expanding. BTW: Don’t ask them where in hell the singularity came from.]

 

 

PSI Blog 20250602

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! Get your copy of the just-released Second Edition of "The Scientific Worldview" to see the step-by-step logic leading to the rational view of the cosmos. Be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution,” the demise of the “Last Creation Myth,” and the age of enlightenment to come. Buy Now.

 

 


1 comment:

  1. Wondering what is your opinion about Irving Segal

    ReplyDelete

Thanks so much for your comment. Be sure to hit "Preview" to see if it will publish correctly. Then hit "Publish". Include your email address if you wish to receive copies of your comment as well as all other published comments to this Blog.

For those having trouble getting this comment section to work:

Nitecruzr writes:

[FAQ] Why can't people post comments on my blog?

The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer. The effects of the newly unavoidable CAPTCHA, and the Google "One account" login, requires third party cookies, even more than before.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/11/the-google-one-account-login-and-cookie.html

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/comments-and-cookie-filters-october-2014.html

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/the-new-commenting-captcha-is.html

Third party cookies filtering, in a browser setting, is the most common solution, overall - but your readers may have to search for other filter(s) that affect their use of Blogger / Google.

Any filters are subject to update, by the creator. If the problem started a few days ago, your readers may have to look on their computers, and find out what product or accessory was updated, a few days ago.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/01/almost-nobody-controls-their-own.html