tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post1601056986252470955..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Why Infinite Universe Theory Requires EtherGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-37967169365658592872011-01-30T16:44:58.779-08:002011-01-30T16:44:58.779-08:00Rex:
Wattles may be rich, but I think he should r...Rex:<br /><br />Wattles may be rich, but I think he should read "The Scientific Worldview" before he does any more scientific philosophy.<br /><br />His errors may be corrected by following these clues:<br /><br />1. Thinking is the special motion that occurs within brains and only within brains.<br />2. Disembodied thought, suggested by Wattles, cannot occur and certainly cannot produce anything.<br />3. There is no "Formless Substance." All microcosms have their unique forms, with ether particles being no exception even though they certainly cannot think.<br />4. Wattles seems to be using the indeterministic (and therefore nonscientific) assumption of immaterialism instead of MATERIALISM (The external world exists after the observer does not). His view is similar to that of Bishop Berkeley who claimed that when he left the room, the chair in which he was sitting disappeared. I imagine that this sort of solipsism could make the chair appear out of nothing as well as implied by Wattles. It is all nonsense of the highest order. It makes one wonder how much “science” can possibly be involved in his method of “getting rich.”Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-57377424879521417032011-01-23T20:03:48.111-08:002011-01-23T20:03:48.111-08:00In the book "The Science of getting Rich"...In the book "The Science of getting Rich" by Wallace D. Wattles he states that:"<br /><br />"There is a thinking Stuff from all things are made, and which, in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspace of the universe.<br /><br />A thught, in this Substance,produces the thing that is imaged by the thought.<br /><br />Man can form things in his thoughtd, and, by impressing his though unpon Formless Substance, can cause the thing he things about to me created."<br /><br />I would thing he was talking about the eather.<br /><br />Does have any thoughts about this formulated statement?<br /><br />RexRex Teetshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14618493092421165697noreply@blogger.com