tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post2007895146193917076..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Milky Way Star Older than the UniverseGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-60266338769207477402013-08-15T08:27:32.253-07:002013-08-15T08:27:32.253-07:00Bill:
Thanks again for the comment. You are right...Bill:<br /><br />Thanks again for the comment. You are right. All this stuff fits with the discovery of elderly galaxies near the limit of observation:<br /><br />http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2011/07/elderly-galaxies-plague-big-bang-theory.html<br /><br />It is sad to watch otherwise smart folks having to suffer these inglorious contradictions. Sort of like being nibbled to death by ducks...Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-1370488599242800772013-08-14T21:43:46.683-07:002013-08-14T21:43:46.683-07:00GB: "No doubt, the theoreticians will make so...GB: <i>"No doubt, the theoreticians will make some adjustments..."</i> <br /><br />Actually, that <i>IS</i> an adjustment. The estimate in 2000 was that it was 16byo +-2by. That was adjusted to 14.5byo +-800my:<br /><br />http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/03/the-methuselah-star-could-it-be-older-than-the-age-of-the-universe.html<br /><br />So, "Methusela" could be only 13.7byo, still "older than the universe." Even if it's adjusted further down, the contradiction is that 13.2bya the entire universe was supposed to be a singularity, with no stars at all.<br /><br />What is truly a miracle is that cosmologists have no problem with such factual and logical contradictions and still call themselves scientists.Westmillerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02865166433794584552noreply@blogger.com