tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post2686588205023331416..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Review of de Climont 's list of critics of regressive physics and cosmogonyGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-79680158430312819512018-02-15T12:04:17.227-08:002018-02-15T12:04:17.227-08:00Glenn, putting QM in your list above is not fair. ...Glenn, putting QM in your list above is not fair. It should be a qualified complaint with it. I notice declimont mentions only the "statistical" part is objectionable to some. I assume the probability aspects. The Bohr view. I think that is long dead. There are objective "proofs" of most of QM.<br />GeorgeBlighhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10160829900151513063noreply@blogger.com