tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post3570837793348574798..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Why Clock Speed Increases at High AltitudeGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-61604692604480437272021-04-17T15:28:21.774-07:002021-04-17T15:28:21.774-07:00Unknown:
Thanks for the comment. Here are some re...Unknown:<br /><br />Thanks for the comment. Here are some refs for you to get up to speed:<br /><br />See these publications on scientific philosophy: <br /><br />Borchardt, Glenn, 2004, The Ten Assumptions of Science: Toward a new scientific worldview: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 125 p. [ https://go.glennborchardt.com/TTAOSfree ].<br />Borchardt, Glenn, 2007, The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 411 p. <br />Borchardt, Glenn, 2017, Infinite Universe Theory: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 327 p. [http://go.glennborchardt.com/IUTebook].<br />Borchardt, Glenn, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 160 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk]<br /><br />The first is a pdf and is free. It also is on Amazon. The second is the magnum opus. BTW: You might want to read the first to see if you can accept the scientific assumptions. If you actually prefer the religious alternatives, then you might want to skip the other books.<br /><br />BTW: All clocks are "mechanical" (matter in motion per Newton's Laws, don't you know).Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-87732420758058437372021-04-15T08:13:17.707-07:002021-04-15T08:13:17.707-07:00Hi there! I just want to say that I think you have...Hi there! I just want to say that I think you have a wonderful imagination, and if you applied your obvious enthusiasm and intellect, you could become an excellent writer of fiction!<br /><br />Please note, by the above, I am not denigrating your scientific endeavors - although as a semi-educated person I do not have the knowledge to go into scientific discussions about even the most obvious points on which I have to differ with you, about what I see as logical mistakes and basic wrong assumptions.<br /><br />For example, I do not know what you hold forth as aether, and how it supposedly interacts with matter, but I do know that satellites do not have "mechanical clocks" - I doubt that they have the need even for any digital display purposes, as no-one is up there and it is all in the digital platform used - which communicates electronically. So it would be impossible for whatever aether is to interfere with the digital time systems - without interfering with the digital systems per se. In this instance one would assume that no satelite would function correctly.<br /><br />I only mentioned this,as the reason for the time dilation experienced is dependent on other theories - well established and confirmed, and as expected by the clever dudes designing these systems.<br /><br />It's just a minor point but it has a knock on effect, as you well know. I have wondered about "stuff" in physics and cosmology and mathematics, only to find the answers and reasoning behind accepted theory pretty convincing and idiot-proof in most cases - me being the idiot - once you start looking closer... LOL!<br /><br />There are a few characters whose "stuff" I have read bits n pieces off, and although thought provoking, that seems to be the whole of their impact - making people like me "think about things". That is to my mind exciting and challenging, and to go as far as stitching together a whole "theory of everything" takes commitment on a scale I sadly lack - by far. <br /><br />Have you considered joining forces with other science geeks who have similar if deviating theories from yours, but also significantly from the general accepted current theories?<br /><br />Philosophy is different animal - I do not think that extremely divergent thought are discarded or ignored, except if it can be proven illogical or patently wrong - so you still have to operate on pretty solid ground or your soapbox will collapse.<br /><br />Where do I find your "magnum opus" to peruse a bit more, if you don't mind?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025172963859395969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-55650173090828581432021-03-22T15:10:50.898-07:002021-03-22T15:10:50.898-07:00From Jesse Witwer:
"I have contended with th...From Jesse Witwer:<br /><br />"I have contended with this a few times and looked into it as well.<br /><br />Further to this, these GPS clocks are in need of constant re-synchronization. They require an accuracy that is well beyond the drift adjustment caused by the Aether pressure changes and their constant motion makes it impossible to correct for. Thus, they are constantly re-synchronized to realign them else they would be wildly inaccurate in short order.<br /><br />Jesse"<br /><br />[GB: Thanks Jesse. Right. There are other factors beyond the aether pressure adjustment caused by aether deceleration, which the GRT folks erroneously take credit for as a result of curved-empty space-time. The satellite macrocosm contains much baryonic matter in addition to aether. Just imagine what happens when a satellite hits or is hit by space debris. All the adjustments are Newtonian--none have anything to do with relativity.]Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.com