tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post384085677193221624..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Elderly Galaxy Disproves Big Bang TheoryGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-58121553419660926832015-03-09T08:18:38.948-07:002015-03-09T08:18:38.948-07:00parallel universes necessary to Immortality (3D Bi...parallel universes necessary to Immortality (3D Bioprinting...Telomerase...)tonyonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08253501266473243514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-15795768862244032402010-02-17T05:16:59.368-08:002010-02-17T05:16:59.368-08:00You have really great taste on catch article title...You have really great taste on catch article titles, even when you are not interested in this topic you push to read itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-28965519508539722442009-09-08T10:21:17.859-07:002009-09-08T10:21:17.859-07:0022.8 billion. Great.
How many times does this hav...22.8 billion. Great.<br /><br />How many times does this have to happen before paradigm-shift begins? What kind of "evidence" would it take to make 'physicists' change their minds?<br /><br />I’m really not optimistic given what you say about light absorption. If that happens, they'll never be convinced. They will have found their singularity. If only it were as simple as point out that they are indeterminists... But they like that kind of thing. Most people do. They want ANSWERS, not questions. Infinity poses... infinite questions. Sounds like a blast to me, but 'physicists' with tenure probably don't care for it.<br /><br />No one ever got a grant for 'I don't know' or more questions.<br /><br />Are results are killing science!Mikenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-63279778410317348312009-09-08T10:20:15.591-07:002009-09-08T10:20:15.591-07:00Thanks Mike. I look forward to your superduper dee...Thanks Mike. I look forward to your superduper deep field prediction becoming true. The Big Bangers have to hope that it goes out to 22.8 billion years for them to claim that the elderly galaxy had enough time to form. Of course, this would mean that some embarrassing recalculations would be necessary. Hawking better get to work on it right away. On the other hand, light absorption over distance means that, at some point, we won't be able to see anymore galaxies even though the universe is infinite. The finity people will jump for joy with that one.Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-10398672503502840372009-09-08T09:05:47.325-07:002009-09-08T09:05:47.325-07:00Comment of 9/4/2009 1:43 pm accidently erased:
W...Comment of 9/4/2009 1:43 pm accidently erased:<br /><br /> Well said as usual, Glenn. The Big Bangers are all running around with their fingers in their ears yelling "la-la-la-la-la" and taking crazy pills. I also keep waiting for the Hubble super-duper-mega-ultra deep field. When that happens, the universe will then be 17 billion years old or some such. It's never-ending (pun intended).Mikenoreply@blogger.com