tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post537102889063728768..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: Absurd Spacetime Concept Leads To Wasting Scientific ResourcesGlenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-67274407989165240442017-06-04T10:23:17.583-07:002017-06-04T10:23:17.583-07:00Arus. You cannot learn about waves from the partic...Arus. You cannot learn about waves from the particle point of view. You need to learn about oscillation theory. From the originator of the concept. ME!Blighhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10160829900151513063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-86188855091548934132017-06-03T19:56:01.954-07:002017-06-03T19:56:01.954-07:00Arus: Thanks so much for your comment. Glad you li...Arus: Thanks so much for your comment. Glad you like the website. You pretty much have the right analysis of the LIGO result. I will answer your question in PSI Blog 20170614 “Gravitational waves” once again confirm the presence of aether.Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-15258310182156039962017-06-02T03:56:17.764-07:002017-06-02T03:56:17.764-07:00Hi Glenn,
Love the blogs and will get your books ...Hi Glenn,<br /><br />Love the blogs and will get your books for sure. Stumbled across the site when I had the same thought (Time IS motion) after struggling for most of my adult life with many of the Einsteinian paradoxes.<br /><br />I commented elsewhere but this seems more appropriate place.<br /><br />Can you provide more detailed speculation on what is actually being detected here and how it is playing out? I am struggling a bit with the detection of these so called waves. If we have only matter and motion......and ether particles are displaced by baryonic matter....are the waves just that? waves in the ether caused by a large combination of baryonic matter?<br /><br />http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40120680Arushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14081455397028941798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-1513653594594490612016-02-13T12:22:23.195-08:002016-02-13T12:22:23.195-08:00after thinking about this LIGO finding for awhile ...after thinking about this LIGO finding for awhile and wanting to fit it in with my theory, I point out this scenario, facts and theory. <br />Gravity is the result of mass times acceleration. Mass is a self-attraction built into the underlying field that allows mass to be deposited. <br />When two whatevers become one mass rather than two, a ripple does occur in the field. It is a mass energy/acceleration wave. <br />When this encounters LIGO, "spacetime" does not exist as a combined physical thing, but instead the mass/acceleration ripple does affect the horiz and vert LIGO apparatus so as to allow a measurable discrepancy in the enhancement or cancellation of the waves. THAT does not prove shortening of the X antenna in terms of length, but does show that something has happened. I think the something is the matter wave (mass) altered by the acceleration that passes down the X and transversely affects the Y limb. <br />Blighhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10160829900151513063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-66113044415873920742016-02-13T11:34:17.094-08:002016-02-13T11:34:17.094-08:00Luis and George:
Thanks guys for the great commen...Luis and George:<br /><br />Thanks guys for the great comments and the clarification. Next Wednesday's Blog will celebrate the DEATH OF ATTRACTION and the replacement of curved spacetime gravity by the Neomechanical Gravitation Theory.Glenn Borchardthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-9075155883882530042016-02-13T10:35:16.267-08:002016-02-13T10:35:16.267-08:00Thanks Luis for your comments .They are appreciate...Thanks Luis for your comments .They are appreciated. I agree that just because a phenomenon has not been detected does not prove it does not exist or occur. The primary idea I was seeking to convey was<br />that the concept of spacetime is absurd. Although the example of the search for gravittaional waves was not a good one, I stand by my contention that the concept of spacetime is invalid, and as spacetime is supposedly without any substance it is incapable of being a medium for gravitational waves. This does not mean the waves do not exist, just that they can not travel without a medium. Thus although the LIGO detected these waves, it did not detect ripples in space time because that is a ridiculous proposition, as is the idea that waves can be propagated in a vacuum (space).The simplest, most reasonable,non contradictory,non paradoxical explanation for what enables gravitational waves (and light waves) to travel is the aether hypotheses in which aether is the medium of transmission. The indoctrination of physicists in the spacetime theory has resulted in their disinterest and even disdain for models involving universal aether as a medium for propagating waves. In addition to predicting gravitational waves Einstein stated in 1920 "There is a weighty reason in favor of ether. To deny ether is to ultimately assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever." Einstein's gravitational waves prediction does not make his theory of space time correct. It seems more rational that these waves are occurring in a medium such as aether than in no medium (spacetime). LIGO's discovery supports Glenn's Neomechanical Gravitaton Theory “which relies on pressure differences, which is what waves amount to.” (Borchardt)George Coynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05437030688390128534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-39561399762844301832016-02-13T01:11:48.198-08:002016-02-13T01:11:48.198-08:00Thanks Luis for your comments on my blog.They are ...Thanks Luis for your comments on my blog.They are appreciated. I fully agree that just because a phenomenon has not been detected does not prove it does not exist or occur. The primary idea I was seeking to convey was that the concept of spacetime is absurd. Although the example I used of the search for gravittaional waves was not a good one I stand by my contention that the concept of spacetime is invalid, and as spacetime is supposedly without any substance it is incapable of being a medium for gravitational waves. (This does not mean the waves do not exist, just that they can not travel without a medium.)Thus although the LIGO detected these waves, it did not detect ripples in space time because that is a completely ridiculous proposition as is the idea that waves can be propagated in a vacuum (space). The simplest, most reasonable,non contradictory,non paradoxical explanation for what enables gravitational waves (and light waves) to travel is the ether hypotheses in which ether is the medium of transmission. The indoctrination of physicists in the spacetime theory has resulted in their disinterest and even disdain for models involving universal ether as a medium for propagating waves. In addition to predicting gravitational waves Einstein in stated in 1920 "There is a weighty reason in favor of ether. To deny ether is to ultimately assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever." <br />Einstein's gravitational waves prediction does not make his theory of space time correct.It seems more rational that these waves are occurring in a medium such as ether than in no medium (spacetime). <br /><br />The LIGO discovery supports Glenn Borchardt's Neomechanical Gravitaton Theory (NGT) “which relies on pressure differences, which is what waveGeorge Coynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05437030688390128534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-2372878475459518222016-02-12T17:00:52.368-08:002016-02-12T17:00:52.368-08:00"As a result of the misguided belief in space..."As a result of the misguided belief in spacetime, there arises the concept of gravity waves which have never been detected despite a great deal of wasted resources in this search."<br /><br />The LIGO project now claims to have evidence of these waves: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160211103935.htm<br /><br />Saying that these waves "have never been detected" seems to be a Red Herring given that we never had instruments with the sensitivity of LIGO's. What's an allowable time frame with which to judge that a search is futile, anyway? These are simply emotional preferences and are completely arbitrary. Aether -1 particles will likely "never be detected", but that doesn't mean they aren't there and that we can't theorize about them. For them the timeframe isn't 100 years (the time since Einstein predicted gravitational waves) but forever into the future.<br /><br />Granted, of course, whatever LIGO found was not a "ripple in space-time", but a ripple in a physical medium composed of matter which is being misinterpreted as an "immaterial field" by mathemagician scientists.Luis Cayetanohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05210714337197709016noreply@blogger.com