tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post6928090533380572322..comments2024-03-04T15:09:00.479-08:00Comments on The Scientific Worldview: What Questions Do You Have About Infinite Universe Theory?Glenn Borchardthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09394474754821945146noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-60317113078383606512021-03-05T20:17:03.498-08:002021-03-05T20:17:03.498-08:00Glenn, I have a question for you regarding an aeth...Glenn, I have a question for you regarding an aether paper by Joseph Levy titled “Is the Aether Entrained by the Motion of Celestial Bodies? What do the Experiments Tell Us?”<br />Levy sees the necessity to include aether in formulating physics theories in writing: "It is difficult, indeed, to accept that a “vacuum”, endowed with physical properties such as permittivity and permeability may be empty. The ability of such an empty vacuum to transmit electromagnetic waves is also doubtful." However, I am certain that you will find many errors with his paper. What areas do you find to be the most problematic with his concepts? Would you please critique it so that your readers will better understand how your theoretical perspective concerning aether and its role in gravitation differs significantly from Levy’s. Thanks!<br />Here is the link to a pdf of his paper: <br />https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.1885.pdf<br />George Coynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05437030688390128534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-27640343859510103122021-02-25T01:15:46.711-08:002021-02-25T01:15:46.711-08:00The past refers to motion that has occurred, and t...The past refers to motion that has occurred, and the future represents motion that has not yet occurred. If "now" is considered in terms of nuclear rotations in an atom, then how many, if any, transpire in the period that is considered now. There are 5 billion trillion nuclear rotations per second. Some presentists would argue that there are no nuclear rotations in the now because the present has a duration of zero. That requires the absence of motion because time is the motion of matter. Without motion there can be no matter. Thus, this leads to the conclusion that in the present there is no matter. Without matter there is no universe. So, for the present to be a reality, there can be no universe and no reality, which means there is no possibility of a present that exists or occurs. My question is: Does the concept of “now” have any reality apart from our thought? If it does, how would you define it?George Coynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05437030688390128534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2202092988208583550.post-74047557797939925852021-02-23T21:30:46.605-08:002021-02-23T21:30:46.605-08:00I highly enjoyed your book Infinite Universe Theor...I highly enjoyed your book Infinite Universe Theory. Thank you for your stunning and informative work. Now on to my question, which doesn't directly relate to the universe being infinite, but is connected. <br /><br />This might sound crazy to you, depending on what you’ve read, but in my research I’ve become pretty convinced that both extraterrestrials and humans have mastered anti-gravity, allowing UFOs, both alien and manmade, to fly in ways that defy conventional physics. Based on your theory of gravity, Aether Deceleration Theory, can you speculate on a possible way to achieve anti-gravity? Tao Linhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04807160197099916059noreply@blogger.com