The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20080714

How to be Religious and Scientific at the Same Time

›
Although there are limitations, folks brought up in one of the many religions still can be fairly good scientists. To do scientific work, on...
3 comments:
20080628

Matterless Motion Wins Again

›
This is a review of " E=mc2: A biography of the world's most famous equation " by David Bodanis, Walker & Company, NY, 2...
5 comments:
20080624

Matter and Space

›
The concepts of matter and space form opposite ends of a continuum, with ideal solid matter on one end and pure empty space on the other. Th...
1 comment:
20080603

Is Ether Negatively Charged?

›
My response to Jim Wright, a member of the NPA Chat group, who presented charge data for some of the planets in the solar system under the h...
1 comment:
20080530

Plasma Physics and Infinite Universe Theory

›
Peter asks: “How does (or doesn't) your understanding of an infinite universe differ from the various plasma/electrical hypotheses being...

The Scientific Faith

›
Science, like religion, is based on "faith" (see " The Ten Assumptions of Science " and its full exposition in " Th...
2 comments:
20080506

Physics Not Without Philosophy

›
PSI Blog 20080506 Physics Not Without Philosophy An interesting question from Phil: "I am wondering if you could give me some pointers ...
3 comments:
20080420

The contradiction between Infinite Universe Theory and the Big Bang Theory

›
Comment addressed to Vikram Arora: I like much of your infinite universe theory. You certainly are differential to the Big Bang theorists,...
5 comments:
20080123

Bernanke is no Greenspan

›
For at least a decade, I have been following the Federal Reserve's actions with respect to 3-month T-bill rates. I noticed that Alan Gre...
3 comments:
20080121

Reponse to a Believer in "Naked Brains"

›
“"Religion" has many definitions, but what distinguishes it from simple "spirituality" is dogma, a canon of beliefs that...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.