The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20101208

Questions From a Reader of “The Ten Assumptions of Science”

›
Fr om Bill Howell with my comments in brackets: Hello Dr. Borchardt. Hope you had a nice Thanksgiving.  My copy of TSW finally arri...
20101202

The Uncertainty Principle and the Death of Classical Mechanics

›
Hello Glenn, Upon further consideration, I believe the Uncertainty Principle is somewhat correct. For example, "Suppose that we wan...
2 comments:
20101124

Why We Need a Unified Theory of Everything

›
Lee asks: Read a review of Marcelo Gleiser's book (American Scientist) in which he argues that the belief that the universe is governe...
20101111

In Scientists We Trust (Or Not)

›
All scientists, particularly those with doubts about relativity and the Big Bang Theory, need to read this month’s Atlantic article entitled...
20101103

Defying Logic

›
Hi Glenn, Which assumption is one violating if they decide to ignore the rules of disciplined math and science? Thanks, Steve Ste...
2 comments:
20101027

Einstein’s Most Important Philosophical Error

›
By definition, a modern physicist is one who does not know what time is. This is indicative of the single philosophical error on Einstein’s ...
2 comments:
20100901

Fatalism, Indeterminism, and Lamarckism

›
The question has been asked with regard to the distinction between fatalism and indeterminism: There are two different mistakes of overempha...
9 comments:
20100827

You Stupid Relativist

›
Hilarious attack on mathematical physics (i.e., regressive physics). Thanks to David de Hilster for the headsup on this. http://www.youstu...
20100818

Interview on The Ten Assumptions of Science

›
Here is the link to the interview with Bill Alek at the Progressive Technology Hour: http://www.vortexnetworknews.com/Progressive_Tech_201...
20100811

Creationism and the Second Law of Thermodynamics

›
In this review of a book involving creationist apologetics, Fred Frees, shows how the glaring philosophical errors of the creationists are n...

Meet Fred Frees

›
Fred Frees is the newest member of the Progressive Science Institute. Fred is the son of Paul Frees, the famous voice actor. He will be doin...
3 comments:
20100802

Contradiction

›
The question was asked: I often notice that a lot of religious people use doublethink but have no realization of it? Religion and scienc...
2 comments:
20100731

The Ten Assumptions of Science (Part 3) Podcast

›
Both the 3-hr podcast and the chat script is available now: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Events&tab1=Display&id=346...
20100727

Ten Assumptions See Daylight

›
I will be presenting a summary of “The Ten Assumptions of Science” on Sat. 7/31 at 7am Pacific Time: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php...
1 comment:
20100721

Nature of Infinity

›
A question from Steve Puetz: I'm trying to decide if infinity can exist in more than one way. I've narrowed the possibilities to t...
3 comments:
20100714

Why Infinite Universe Theory Requires Ether

›
Why must an ether exist, in order to justify IUT? Cannot there simply be enough random matter in the universe to eventually filter out all l...
2 comments:
20100623

Is the universe infinitely old?

›
Yes indeed, the universe is infinitely old and of infinite extent. Current cosmogony relies, instead, on the interpretation of the galactic ...
20100621

Unified Cycle Theory: Integration Toward a Cause

›
Here is the abstract of the paper I am presenting on Wednesday with Steve Puetz at the 2010 Natural Philosophy Alliance conference at Long B...
20100526

Are the Steady State Theory and the Infinite Universe Theory identical?

›
This question was posed on Yahoo Answers: “I know the Big Bang Theory is pretty much the only one accepted in science, but I want to learn...
20100519

Review of Oler’s Unified Cycle Theory

›
In the early seventies Edward Oler produced numerous small books and pamphlets touting his “Unified Cycle Theory.” This recently became of i...
20100512

Elderly Galactic Clusters and the Timetable for the Demise of Cosmogony

›
PSI Blog 20100512 Elderly Galactic Clusters and the Timetable for the Demise of Cosmogony Fig. 12-3. Sigmoidal growth curve for global popu...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.