The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20130501

Relative Infinity

›
Ed asks: I was wondering if the following are correct as far as the 10 assumptions are concerned? The universe is infinitely large...
4 comments:
20130424

Freewill and Quantum Mechanics

›
Misguided folks in the mainstream keep looking to quantum mechanics (QM) to support their belief in freewill. Of course, all that is handl...
20130417

Univironmental Determinism, Evolution Deniers, and the Big Bang Theory

›
Even though the suppositions underlying the Big Bang Theory are taken straight out of Genesis, many creationists nevertheless find the the...
4 comments:
20130410

Birth of Univironmental Determinism

›
Wilderness love can get you out of the office just when it is needed, even if you don't  know that it is needed. Showers Lake, in the...
20130405

Is Dark Matter the “Universal Glue”?

›
Thanks to Carl, who sent this heads-up: According to Wednesday's report, we are getting close to discovering the nature of the “myst...
7 comments:
20130327

Our Gravitational Redshift Interpretation Confirmed

›
To Steve Puetz, my co-author on "Universal Cycle Theory: Neomechanics of the Hierarchically Infinite Universe": Congra...
3 comments:
20130320

Vortices in Media are Responsible for Magnetism

›
Last week’s blog provide a video demo of the physical reason for charge. This week I provide a link to Ionel Dinu ’s video demonstratin...
20130313

Vortices in Media are Responsible for Charge

›
Astute readers will remember that, at the end of my 2009 paper, “The Physical Meaning of E=mc 2 ” http://scientificphilosophy.com/Down...
20130306

Vexed Questions and Cosmogony

›
Ron asks: I was looking to see if you claim solutions to some vexed questions but could not see any reference to them. Also it does no...
2 comments:
20130227

The Aging “Crisis” in Physics

›
The silliness of relativity and the Big Bang Theory (BBT) has been plaguing thinkers for over a century. Some consider this a “crisis” in ph...
11 comments:
20130220

Homeopathy: How Indeterminism can Cause Fatalities

›
Lacking suitable philosophical guidance, indeterminists often tend to be on the wrong side of scientific arguments. The debate over homeopat...
20130213

Mass: Inertial and Gravitational

›
Bob de Hilster asks: So, what is the difference between inertial mass and gravitational mass? Newton's first principle is the ...
2 comments:
20130206

Sidetracking the Big Bang Theory

›
In reference to the extreme durability of regressive paradigms, such as the Big Bang Theory (BBT), Samuel Hunt brought this quote to the att...
4 comments:
20130130

Thomas Nagel and the Failures of Neo-Darwinism

›
Indeterministic philosopher Thomas Nagel has taken quite a shot at neo-Darwinism with his latest book, “ Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialis...
2 comments:
20130123

Templeton and Quantum Confusion

›
Bill Westmiller writes: I found this quiz of mainstream physicists interesting. Contrary to the impression of universal agreement on t...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.