The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20130710

Critique of "The Scientific Worldview": Part 5a The Ten Assumptions of Science: Uncertainty

›
The indeterminist's eternal quest for absolute certainty and the popularity of Aristotle's "absolute chance." I am ever...
2 comments:
20130703

Crashing Galaxies in the Infinite Universe

›
Hi Dr. Borchardt- As I think you know, I generally accept the 10 Assumptions of Science.  The recent photo of the (so-called) Pengu...
1 comment:

What Does God Say About Science?

›
20130626

Critique of "The Scientific Worldview": Part 4 The Ten Assumptions of Science: Causality

›
Bill's unmitigation, Aristotle's absolute chance, and Bohm's infinite causality. I am ever so grateful to Bill Westmiller, w...
2 comments:
20130619

Momentum Does Not Exist

›
Glenn I have been studying the physics behind the gyroscope.  One of the keys to the gyro seems to be its angular momentum It is yo...
20130612

Best Essay on the Conflict Between Science and Religion

›
Thanks be to Jerry Coyne for the heads up on Natalie Angier's wonderfully humorous essay, which starts on the second page of: http://w...
20130605

Critique of "The Scientific Worldview": Part 3 The Ten Assumptions of Science: Materialism

›
The difference between immaterialism and idealism. Collingwood's criteria for fundamental assumptions. The Ten Assumptions of Scienc...
20130529

Critique of "The Scientific Worldview": Part 2 The Renaissance of Determinism

›
Infinity forces us to use assumptions. The difference between science and religion: opposing assumptions. The Renaissance of Determinis...
2 comments:
20130522

Critique of "The Scientific Worldview": Part 1 Introduction and Renaissance of Determinism

›
STUDY GUIDE FOR READERS OF "THE SCIENTIFIC WORLDVIEW." One of my best commenters, William Westmiller, has kindly consented to p...
1 comment:
20130515

Neomechanical Explanation of the Photoelectric Effect

›
  A student of univironmental determinism writes: “After finishing reading Universal Cycle Theory, I was left wondering how you and Pu...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.