This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.
20120822
Paradox Resolution
1 comment:
Thanks so much for your comment. Be sure to hit "Preview" to see if it will publish correctly. Then hit "Publish". Include your email address if you wish to receive copies of your comment as well as all other published comments to this Blog.
For those having trouble getting this comment section to work:
Nitecruzr writes:
[FAQ] Why can't people post comments on my blog?
The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer. The effects of the newly unavoidable CAPTCHA, and the Google "One account" login, requires third party cookies, even more than before.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/11/the-google-one-account-login-and-cookie.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/comments-and-cookie-filters-october-2014.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/the-new-commenting-captcha-is.html
Third party cookies filtering, in a browser setting, is the most common solution, overall - but your readers may have to search for other filter(s) that affect their use of Blogger / Google.
Any filters are subject to update, by the creator. If the problem started a few days ago, your readers may have to look on their computers, and find out what product or accessory was updated, a few days ago.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/01/almost-nobody-controls-their-own.html
Dear Professor Borchardt
ReplyDeleteMy Paper on Hardy's paradox: I don't have access to publish, and I am trying to find someone who would be interested in perhaps co-authoring with me.
The topic has wide application in how we think of the place of paradox. Although there are many detailed accountings in the examples of paradox, there has never been a proposition for a general theorem as far as I am aware; there has never been an attempt to show its place other than as an anomaly. The paper I have linked below on my Google Drive is exactly the opposite. If you have interest, I would be glad to have your advice. If you know someone who would be interested, please feel free to pass on the information.
My one concern perhaps is that it is a completely new direction in philosophical thinking on the subject of paradox from Russell's paradox down. If correct, the concept challenges the point of view in many papers on the subject, past and future.
Best Regards
Thanks for any thoughts on this.
Doug Gill
Here is the link and Abstract
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14AkRdov8G-JQeSY4nC-yWytNx-My6pyJ/view?usp=share_link
A Geometric Model for the Structure of Hardy's Paradox
with Perspective on the Formal Understanding of Infinities
and Application to Bell’s Inequality
Abstract
A geometric model is presented in the analysis of the quantum theory and experimental results for Hardy's paradox. The model accurately predicts the outcome for the experimental data and further explains the reason for the discrepancy between the theoretical calculations of quantum theory and the experimental data. Based on this justification, the paper argues that paradox is a systemic mechanism in the universe, and finally that Bell's theorem does not demonstrate a failure of classical relativity theory.
Keywords: Hardy’s paradox, paradox, quantum mechanics, relativity theory, EPR, Bell’s theorem, Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, Cantor’s diagonal slash argument, Russell’s paradox.