This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.
20150415
Matter and Time
6 comments:
Thanks so much for your comment. Be sure to hit "Preview" to see if it will publish correctly. Then hit "Publish". Include your email address if you wish to receive copies of your comment as well as all other published comments to this Blog.
For those having trouble getting this comment section to work:
Nitecruzr writes:
[FAQ] Why can't people post comments on my blog?
The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer. The effects of the newly unavoidable CAPTCHA, and the Google "One account" login, requires third party cookies, even more than before.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/11/the-google-one-account-login-and-cookie.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/comments-and-cookie-filters-october-2014.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/the-new-commenting-captcha-is.html
Third party cookies filtering, in a browser setting, is the most common solution, overall - but your readers may have to search for other filter(s) that affect their use of Blogger / Google.
Any filters are subject to update, by the creator. If the problem started a few days ago, your readers may have to look on their computers, and find out what product or accessory was updated, a few days ago.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/01/almost-nobody-controls-their-own.html
Assuming this is place to respond to Steve.
ReplyDeleteFundamentally, time is motion. The ancient Greeks called it change. I like energy best, but that is vague also. The physical universe "changes" at an infinitesimal rate. The "state" of physical matter changes in an analogue fashion. Best thought of as a wave like form. The infinitesimal state changes are what we recognize as time evolution.
Is that more clear?
Bligh (George)
test
ReplyDeleteRita, sorry for web inexperience. I don't know how to find your comment and respond.
ReplyDeleteblighcapn@yahoo.com
Bligh:
ReplyDeleteYou wrote: "I like energy best, but that is vague also." [Sorry, but energy is not motion, it is a calculation. Energy neither exists nor occurs. It is a matter-motion term and thus is neither matter nor motion. Regressive physicists don’t understand energy either, mostly because they do not always adhere to the Fourth Assumption of Science, inseparability (Just as there is no motion without matter, so there is no matter without motion).]
You also wrote: “The physical universe "changes" at an infinitesimal rate. The "state" of physical matter changes in an analogue fashion. Best thought of as a wave like form. The infinitesimal state changes are what we recognize as time evolution.” [Sorry, but changes occur at varying rates, some fast, some slow, obviously. Individual microcosms do not have a wave-like form. Wave motion is group behavior. For instance, water waves are properties of trillions of water molecules. Also, time does not evolve. Both time and evolution are motions. So, that would be like saying that evolution evolves. Only microcosms can evolve, because only microcosms can move.]
Comment from Bligh:
ReplyDelete“I have a theory that underlying matter and motion is a fundamental oscillation between two states, matter and anti-matter. Oscillation is motion and energy, whether you consider energy to be defined as an amount or not. It is analogous to motion. Oscillation is just a more specific type of motion.”
Sorry, but anti-matter does not exist. In neomechanics we define matter as an xyz portion of the universe that contains other matter ad infinitum. The anti-matter conception seems to derive from what happens during electron-positron annihilation in which oppositely spinning complexes of aether collide and disintegrate into a cloud of aether particles (Borchardt, 2009).
Sorry, but oscillation is motion, but it is not energy. Energy is a calculation, not a thing or a motion. It is not analogous to motion, but a matter-motion term that has no meaning without the concomitant matter, per the Fourth Assumption of Science, inseparability (Just as there is no motion without matter, so there is no matter without motion).
Reference:
Borchardt, Glenn, 2009, The physical meaning of E=mc2, in Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, Storrs, CN, v. 6, no. 1, 27-31.
Why is time linearized although clocks using circualr motion to construct a linear time? If one says that now waves are used I remark that a wave can be visualized easily by circular motion. Anyhow, it makes calculations easier and it can be used to construct a fourth dimension which makes things rather complicated. So, my question remains.
ReplyDelete