By George Coyne
Not only do regressive physicists maintain that it is
impossible for the universe to exist, they also are convinced that quantum
particles “can exist simultaneously in two or more places.” How incredibly
weird is that? Does this make any logical or rational sense to anyone other
than true believers of the standard QM Copenhagen model? To me it seems
profoundly unscientific. These physicists try to deflect any attention from the
absurdity of their belief systems by confidently claiming that the universe is
very weird. Does anyone think that they would try the same tactic in a court of
law if charged with a crime that they had committed? Would they tell the jury
that they accepted that their alibi was completely implausible and totally
impossible, but nevertheless it is valid and should be believed? Would they
argue that it is just due to the nature of the universe that makes it seem that
they are guilty when in reality they are innocent? They would only try such a
tactic if they were attempting to make a case for an insanity plea.
As a result of the misguided belief in spacetime, there arises
the concept of gravity waves which have never been detected despite a great
deal of wasted resources in this search. The erroneous claim on March 17, 2014
by astronomers at the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics that "they
had detected and produced the first direct image of gravitational waves across
the primordial sky" was later disproved. By January 30, 2015 a news item
in Nature stated "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead."
On the night of December 2, 2015 the European Space agency
launched LISA on a mission to make test measurements for a method that will be
employed to detect “gravitational waves.” These waves, according to Einstein's
predictions, are “ripples in spacetime.” But since spacetime is only imaginary,
it does not actually exist, and thus it cannot have ripples.
Glenn Borchardt's neomechanical explanation of gravity as
being "produced by variations in aether pressure” is logical and rational.
It has the great advantage over the relativity model in that it does not
require the irrational concept of spacetime and is consistent with Newton's
classical mechanics.
Thanks Luis for your comments on my blog.They are appreciated. I fully agree that just because a phenomenon has not been detected does not prove it does not exist or occur. The primary idea I was seeking to convey was that the concept of spacetime is absurd. Although the example I used of the search for gravittaional waves was not a good one I stand by my contention that the concept of spacetime is invalid, and as spacetime is supposedly without any substance it is incapable of being a medium for gravitational waves. (This does not mean the waves do not exist, just that they can not travel without a medium.)Thus although the LIGO detected these waves, it did not detect ripples in space time because that is a completely ridiculous proposition as is the idea that waves can be propagated in a vacuum (space). The simplest, most reasonable,non contradictory,non paradoxical explanation for what enables gravitational waves (and light waves) to travel is the ether hypotheses in which ether is the medium of transmission. The indoctrination of physicists in the spacetime theory has resulted in their disinterest and even disdain for models involving universal ether as a medium for propagating waves. In addition to predicting gravitational waves Einstein in stated in 1920 "There is a weighty reason in favor of ether. To deny ether is to ultimately assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever."
ReplyDeleteEinstein's gravitational waves prediction does not make his theory of space time correct.It seems more rational that these waves are occurring in a medium such as ether than in no medium (spacetime).
The LIGO discovery supports Glenn Borchardt's Neomechanical Gravitaton Theory (NGT) “which relies on pressure differences, which is what wave
Thanks Luis for your comments .They are appreciated. I agree that just because a phenomenon has not been detected does not prove it does not exist or occur. The primary idea I was seeking to convey was
ReplyDeletethat the concept of spacetime is absurd. Although the example of the search for gravittaional waves was not a good one, I stand by my contention that the concept of spacetime is invalid, and as spacetime is supposedly without any substance it is incapable of being a medium for gravitational waves. This does not mean the waves do not exist, just that they can not travel without a medium. Thus although the LIGO detected these waves, it did not detect ripples in space time because that is a ridiculous proposition, as is the idea that waves can be propagated in a vacuum (space).The simplest, most reasonable,non contradictory,non paradoxical explanation for what enables gravitational waves (and light waves) to travel is the aether hypotheses in which aether is the medium of transmission. The indoctrination of physicists in the spacetime theory has resulted in their disinterest and even disdain for models involving universal aether as a medium for propagating waves. In addition to predicting gravitational waves Einstein stated in 1920 "There is a weighty reason in favor of ether. To deny ether is to ultimately assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever." Einstein's gravitational waves prediction does not make his theory of space time correct. It seems more rational that these waves are occurring in a medium such as aether than in no medium (spacetime). LIGO's discovery supports Glenn's Neomechanical Gravitaton Theory “which relies on pressure differences, which is what waves amount to.” (Borchardt)
Luis and George:
ReplyDeleteThanks guys for the great comments and the clarification. Next Wednesday's Blog will celebrate the DEATH OF ATTRACTION and the replacement of curved spacetime gravity by the Neomechanical Gravitation Theory.
after thinking about this LIGO finding for awhile and wanting to fit it in with my theory, I point out this scenario, facts and theory.
ReplyDeleteGravity is the result of mass times acceleration. Mass is a self-attraction built into the underlying field that allows mass to be deposited.
When two whatevers become one mass rather than two, a ripple does occur in the field. It is a mass energy/acceleration wave.
When this encounters LIGO, "spacetime" does not exist as a combined physical thing, but instead the mass/acceleration ripple does affect the horiz and vert LIGO apparatus so as to allow a measurable discrepancy in the enhancement or cancellation of the waves. THAT does not prove shortening of the X antenna in terms of length, but does show that something has happened. I think the something is the matter wave (mass) altered by the acceleration that passes down the X and transversely affects the Y limb.
Hi Glenn,
ReplyDeleteLove the blogs and will get your books for sure. Stumbled across the site when I had the same thought (Time IS motion) after struggling for most of my adult life with many of the Einsteinian paradoxes.
I commented elsewhere but this seems more appropriate place.
Can you provide more detailed speculation on what is actually being detected here and how it is playing out? I am struggling a bit with the detection of these so called waves. If we have only matter and motion......and ether particles are displaced by baryonic matter....are the waves just that? waves in the ether caused by a large combination of baryonic matter?
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40120680
Arus: Thanks so much for your comment. Glad you like the website. You pretty much have the right analysis of the LIGO result. I will answer your question in PSI Blog 20170614 “Gravitational waves” once again confirm the presence of aether.
ReplyDeleteArus. You cannot learn about waves from the particle point of view. You need to learn about oscillation theory. From the originator of the concept. ME!
ReplyDelete