This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.
20170705
Boundaries and existence in the Infinite Universe
10 comments:
Thanks so much for your comment. Be sure to hit "Preview" to see if it will publish correctly. Then hit "Publish". Include your email address if you wish to receive copies of your comment as well as all other published comments to this Blog.
For those having trouble getting this comment section to work:
Nitecruzr writes:
[FAQ] Why can't people post comments on my blog?
The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer. The effects of the newly unavoidable CAPTCHA, and the Google "One account" login, requires third party cookies, even more than before.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/11/the-google-one-account-login-and-cookie.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/comments-and-cookie-filters-october-2014.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/the-new-commenting-captcha-is.html
Third party cookies filtering, in a browser setting, is the most common solution, overall - but your readers may have to search for other filter(s) that affect their use of Blogger / Google.
Any filters are subject to update, by the creator. If the problem started a few days ago, your readers may have to look on their computers, and find out what product or accessory was updated, a few days ago.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/01/almost-nobody-controls-their-own.html
When liquid droplets (of water or various chemicals), frozen crystals or particles suspended in the atmosphere in close proximity are sufficient in numbers to be noticed by observers, these are described together as if they exist as one object, which is referred to as a cloud. Each droplet or particle exists by itself with boundaries, but the “cloud” is a mental construct, rather than an actual thing.
ReplyDeleteThere is only one requirement for a boundary to exist: that which is outside of it must differ from what is within the object. For example, “cloud” and “not cloud.”
ReplyDeleteWhen liquid droplets (of water or various chemicals) frozen crystals or particles suspended in the atmosphere in close proximity reach sufficient in numbers to be noticed by observers, they are described together as one object, which is referred to as a cloud. Each droplet or particle exists by itself, and has discernible boundaries, unlike the cloud whose boundaries are vague. These particles or droplets, when grouped together to form a cloud, are an excellent example of a microcosm. The particles or droplets are the submicrocosms. These contain sub-submicrocosms of H2O.
Thanks to Glenn for his assistance in this post.
ReplyDeleteThere is only one requirement for a boundary to exist: that which is outside of it must differ from what is within the object. For example, “cloud” and “not cloud.”
When liquid droplets (of water or various chemicals,) frozen crystals or particles suspended in the atmosphere in close proximity are sufficient in numbers to be noticed by observers, they are described together as one object, which is referred to as a cloud. Each droplet or particle exists by itself, and has discernible boundaries, unlike the cloud whose boundaries are vague. These particles or droplets, when grouped together to form a cloud, are an excellent example of a microcosm. The particles or droplets are the submicrocosms. These contain sub-submicrocosms of H2O.
Paul A. Deck of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University wrote an article titled: “Why do clouds always appear to form in distinct clumps? Why isn't there a uniform fog of condensation, especially on windy days when one would expect mixing?” In it he explains why some clouds haves sharp boundaries, while others have diffuse ones. Here is an excerpt: ” Thus, how sharp a cloud boundary appears is a function of how much the cloud air mixes with the clear air environment.” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-do-clouds-always-appe/
ReplyDeleteGlenn, wondering if you feel this piece does the concept of boundary conditions of the universe justice / is related to this blog?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.wired.com/story/cosmologists-clash-over-the-beginning-of-the-universe/
Kim
Kim: Thanks for the comment and the link. Regressives like these get a lot of press even though they usually make no sense. None ever seem to question the “expanding universe” interpretation. They are stuck with it along with its indeterministic foundation: Einstein’s “Untired Light Theory” (see https://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2019/04/why-do-big-bang-theory-and-steady-state.html). Consequently, I try to avoid getting involved in these “How Many Angels can Dance on the Head of a Pin” debates. Those regressive imaginings are more suited to sci-fi and religion than science.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Glenn. So I think you are saying that this concept of boundary conditions of the universe is itself a “How Many Angels can Dance on the Head of a Pin” debate? The exact shape of coming from a singularity would not apply if one is not coming from a singularity I guess. Nice math, wrong question?
ReplyDeleteYes, yes, and yes. You are correct on all accounts. Remember that nonexistence (perfectly empty space) is an idealization, just like perfectly solid matter. Idealizations do not and cannot exist. So, the infinite universe goes on and on, without end (i.e., a "boundary"). Once you get all your ducks in a row, the boundary question disappears.
ReplyDeleteNicely said. Love the site! :D
ReplyDeleteThanks so much!
ReplyDelete