This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.
20190403
Next-generation Particle Accelerator in Doubt
4 comments:
Thanks so much for your comment. Be sure to hit "Preview" to see if it will publish correctly. Then hit "Publish". Include your email address if you wish to receive copies of your comment as well as all other published comments to this Blog.
For those having trouble getting this comment section to work:
Nitecruzr writes:
[FAQ] Why can't people post comments on my blog?
The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer. The effects of the newly unavoidable CAPTCHA, and the Google "One account" login, requires third party cookies, even more than before.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/11/the-google-one-account-login-and-cookie.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/comments-and-cookie-filters-october-2014.html
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/the-new-commenting-captcha-is.html
Third party cookies filtering, in a browser setting, is the most common solution, overall - but your readers may have to search for other filter(s) that affect their use of Blogger / Google.
Any filters are subject to update, by the creator. If the problem started a few days ago, your readers may have to look on their computers, and find out what product or accessory was updated, a few days ago.
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/01/almost-nobody-controls-their-own.html
I read the Unzicker book but found it of little use.
ReplyDeleteTheory is not fact and we should all know that!
Atomic physics must deal with subatomic detail and there are the limitations of Planck's numbers.
1) of course its all theory but that is because of the subject matter.
2) of course the ratio of noise to real data is high, again that's due to the subject matter.
But in defense particle physics does have evidence to show for its conclusions and it tries, so Unzicker should show us something better and he can't.
I quote: "its evidence-based roots and shifted to untestable mathematical theories,..." That is suggesting that modern math theories are just phantasies and not about the world or the universe. Great. Reading math books, almost all books aren't explaining but just giving axioma's, definitions and rules to follow. There is no link to what people are experiencing during their life. The claim is then that the higher the abstraction is, the more it represents reality. Math is about structures, they say. Which structures, is then the question. Producing paradoxical situations means that there is something wrong with the basic assumptions. As far as I know, in the past, math theories were developped to get a better understanding of physical phenomenae not the other way around.
ReplyDeleteFrom: Don Briddell:
ReplyDelete"I read Unzicker’s book and recommend it."
As seen from the above comments, there are opposing opinions concerning the value of the Higgs "discovery." In general, in science you only can find what you are looking for. The fleeting half-life (10 billion trillionth of a second) and hugh mass (126 times that of a proton) does not inspire belief or confidence in normal people. One cannot blame the Japanese for second thoughts: Is that all there is? You want $3.5 billion for what?
ReplyDelete