PSI
Blog 20200217 Breaking news from the mainstream: Photons do not exist
From
George Coyne:
“Glenn,
Geoff Jones of the University of Sussex
contends it is ‘wrong, and unnecessary’ to describe light in terms of
small, localized particles. This idea removes some of the confusion in quantum
descriptions of the double-slit experiment. His concept of what is ‘detected’
as a photon is the removal of one quantum or packet of energy from
the field. This use of the word “energy” differs from Borchardt’s
definition of energy as representing a mathematical calculation.”
[GB: Thanks George for the heads up. It is nice
the photon is being dissed by the mainstream. However, this is also just
another instance in which aether particles are being mistaken for magical
imaginings. There is no such thing as a “packet of energy.” What in the heck
would that be? The E=mc2 equation merely describes the transfer of motion from
one thing to another. Of course, for aether deniers that transfer amounts to
the conversion of mass into magical energy that flits off through empty space.
Any “detection” of an aether particle must
involve a collision in which that particle must transfer its motion to the
detector in order for it to be detected. The detected aether particle must, in
turn, be decelerated, effectively “removing it from the field”
(i.e., making it less active or “energetic,” thus making it appear less
noticeable and more likely to be considered as having been “removed.”]
About this "photons do not exist" stuff. It is true. See my experiments. A strong prediction of quantum mechanics (QM) is to say a photon goes one way or another at a beam-splitter. If you do the test with visible light you will see a chance-like noise of clicks going each way, as predicted by QM. I do the test with gamma-rays and show how the photon model fails. I did the same test with alpha-rays. See http://www.thresholdmodel.com Thank you, Eric Reiter, March 10, 2020.
ReplyDelete