More evidence falsifying the Big Bang Theory—"The most distant galaxy is upending our model of the universe's history"

PSI Blog 20210104 More evidence falsifying the Big Bang Theory—"The most distant galaxy is upending our model of the universe's history"

 

Thanks to Bill Howell for this heads-up article by Karlis on another elderly galaxy falsifying the Big Bang Theory.

 

The most distant galaxy is upending our model of the universe's history

A new study confirms GN-z11 is the oldest and most distant galaxy humans have ever sighted

 

 

The galaxy GN-z11, which scientists think could be the farthest and oldest galaxy every observed, superimposed on an image from the COODS-North survey. (NASA, ESA, P. Oesch (Yale University), G. Brammer (STScI), P. van Dokkum (Yale University), and G. Illingworth (University of California, Santa Cruz))

 

https://go.glennborchardt.com/Elderly-GN-z11

 

Bill writes: “With the Webb coming online next year, it shouldn't be long before we start getting images of galaxies older than the Universe ;-).”

 

[GB: Here are some cosmogonical quotes:

 

“the light we see from it left 13.4 billion years ago — only 400 million years after the Big Bang.”

 

“"The detected light of carbon and oxygen suggests special physical conditions not found in present-day galaxies," Kashikawa told Salon. "The age of GN-z11 is estimated to be only 70 million years and the estimated mass of a billion times that of the Sun (the stellar component)  suggests that this young galaxy was born and grew rapidly."

 

Kashikawa added: "The fact that carbon and oxygen were found in GN-z11 indicates that this galaxy is not the first (metal-free) galaxy in the universe." Since elements heavier than hydrogen and helium are only forged in massive stars, the presence of heavier elements like carbon indicate that the stars in the galaxy are at least second-generation, meaning one generation of large suns has already lived and died, expelling their metals into the galaxy.

 

This means, said, that the first galaxies in the universe are still "in a more distant universe unknown to mankind."”

 

Wow! A whole galaxy only 70 million years old! Not only that, but it contains elements that had to be recycled from still earlier stars. There is no way this galaxy containing a billion stars could possibly be that young. It is obvious that Kashikawa’s “distant unknown universe” is simply evidence for a portion of the Infinite Universe much like what we observe nearby. The absurd 70-million-year date is an ad hoc made up to avoid conflict with the equally ridiculous Big Bang Theory.

NASA’s official view of what the Big Bang universe should look like (seriously).[1] Credit: NASA.

---

[1] http://go.glennborchardt.com/NASABBT 

As seen in the figure above, cosmological bodies at increasing distances are supposed to be younger and younger. There is no evidence for that. Kashikawa has found evidence for just the opposite. His oldest, recycled galaxy at the limit of present observation is confirmation of Infinite Universe Theory and a disproof of both the Big Bang Theory and the Multiverse Theory. Too bad he doesn’t even realize that.]