20241111

Big Bang Assumptions—'Webb has shown us they are clearly wrong'

PSI Blog 20241111 Big Bang Assumptions—'Webb has shown us they are clearly wrong'


Astrophysicist speculates on how young “black holes” at the edge of the Big Bang universe formed impossibly fast.

 

 An artist's rendering of a black hole (Image credit: Vadim Sadovski via Shutterstock)

 

Thanks to Jesse Witwer for this heads up:

 

By Ben Turner:

 

How astrophysicist Sophie Koudami's research on supermassive black holes is rewriting the history of our universe

 

A supermassive mystery lurks at the center of the Milky Way. Supermassive black holes are gigantic ruptures in space-time that sit in the middle of many galaxies, periodically sucking in matter before spitting it out at near light speeds to shape how galaxies evolve.

 

Yet how they came to be so enormous is a prevailing mystery in astrophysics, made even deeper by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Since it came online in 2022, the telescope has found that the cosmic monsters are shockingly abundant and massive in the few million years after the Big Bang — a discovery that defies many of our best models for how black holes grew.”

 

[GB: Readers know the Big Bang universe is supposed to have increasingly young cosmological objects as we look back into the past. The currently observed “edge” of that hypothesized finite, expanding universe is 13 billion years away. Cosmogonists like Sophie are racing to come up with yet another ad hoc that would save cosmogony once again.

 

Despite the misnomer, black holes simply are the nuclei found in galaxies such as our own 13.61-billion-year-old Milky Way. Elsewhere, they exist as elderly naked nucleic remnants lacking stars.

 

In reading this article you will find other misnomers still being perpetrated by regressive physics and cosmogony. One is the idea that gravitational force is not a force (a push), but an “attraction” (a magical pull). But, according to Infinite Universe Theory, the pushers happen to be ubiquitous non-luminous aether particles (otherwise known as “Dark Matter”).[1] In outer space, these have high local velocities and form a high-pressure medium. When these particles collide with ordinary matter, they produce the acceleration we call gravitation. Per Newton's Second Law of Motion, the colliding aether particles become decelerated, forming a relatively low pressure aetherosphere around each object. This process is responsible for the pushing together (fusion) of all things in the universe.

 

In the case of black hole formation, this means stars are being pushed toward the centers of the galaxies. As that pressure becomes ever-more intense, elements that were previously fused into ever more massive, dense derivative elements (helium, iron, lead, gold, and uranium, etc.) become further compressed. As in the Sun’s fusion of hydrogen to form helium, this process emits internal motion to the surroundings. The surroundings, as always, contain an aether medium capable of carrying that motion away in the form of the waves we call radiation.

 

Note that Sophie has great hope for the detection of Einstein’s “gravitational waves” for learning more about why elderly black holes form so fast. There will be further gravitational wave detections, but they never will answer her question. That is because the fusion processes I described takes billions of years, not the millions of years indicated by the Big Bang Theory. The Webb photos are like finding a 20-year-old in your crib.]

 

 

PSI Blog 20241111

 

 Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.”  There you can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your questions. You can get more than three posts per month by subscribing for $5/month or $50/year. That gets you unlimited access to over a million posts per month. You would be among over 60 million registered users who can enjoy some great independent writing free from the censorship common to the mainstream.

No comments: