Big Bang Theory’s Achilles’ Heel: Conservation vs Creation

PSI Blog 20250421 Big Bang Theory’s Achilles’ Heel: Conservation vs Creation

 

The Fifth Assumption of Science, conservation (Matter and the motion of matter can be neither created nor destroyed).

 

The boulder in a car park features a distinct dinosaur footprint. (CREDIT: University of Queensland)

 

Infinite Universe Theory is founded on "The Ten Assumptions of Science,"[1] with No. 5, conservation, also being number one in my list of the 25 falsifications of the absurd Big Bang Theory.[2] It is interesting that David Balogun, a nine-year-old genius from Nigeria used conservation to best Neil deGrasse Tyson in a debate about the validity of the Big Bang Theory.[3]

 

Because the universe is infinite, fundamental assumptions such as conservation and its opposite, creation, cannot be completely proven. Nonetheless, holding fast to conservation, astute scientists and well-educated nine-year-olds from Nigeria reject the Big Bang Theory outright. It is the reason I call it the “Last Creation Myth.”

 

In the US, the philosophical struggle between science and religion still seems centered on the creation-evolution debate. This has special advantages for the religious side. Neo-Darwinists who argue the scientific side seem also to support the Big Bang Theory, probably because it hypothesizes evolution for their surreptitiously assumed finite universe. The explosion of something out of nothing and its violation of conservation does not seem to bother them. Of course, evolution still obtains for each portion of the universe, as seen in my book[4] and in today’s 200-million-year example.

 

There are some indications neo-Darwinists or their replacements are getting out of their myopic stupor.[5] Scientific broadening is getting folks to realize that everything in the Infinite Universe is subject to evolution. Conservation holds in the face of the universal mechanism of evolution—univironmental determinism. While matter and the motion of matter never can be destroyed, it is incessantly changed from one form to another.

 

Note: I once believed Earth was 6,000 years old. If you are still at that stage, maybe this will change your mind:

 

200-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Tracks Discovered Hidden In Schoolyard Boulder

 

 

PSI Blog 20250421

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! Get your copy of the just-released Second Edition of "The Scientific Worldview" to see the step-by-step logic leading to the rational view of the cosmos. Be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution,” the demise of the “Last Creation Myth,” and the age of enlightenment to come. Buy Now.

 

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn, 2004, The Ten Assumptions of Science: Toward a New Scientific Worldview: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 125 p. [https://gborc.com/TTAOS; https://gborc.com/TTAOSpdf].

 

[2] https://gborc.com/BBT-FAILS

 

[3] https://gborc.com/Balogun

 

[4] Borchardt, Glenn, 2025, The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein (2 ed.): Walnut Creek, CA, Progressive Science Institute, 551 p. [https://gborc.com/TSW25].

[5] Wong, et al. 2023, On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 120, no. 43, p. e2310223120. [doi:10.1073/pnas.2310223120].