Does Supporting an Obsolete Paradigm (like the Big Bang Theory) Result in Financial Gain?

 PSI Blog 20250505 Does Supporting an Obsolete Paradigm (like the Big Bang Theory) Result in Financial Gain?

 

Today’s example: $tents and the US medical system

 

 I was shocked, shocked to read one medical doctor’s opinion (and facts) on the use of stents in cardiac care. In short, it seems that stents (like the ones my father had) don’t lengthen life or reduce morbidity. Decades later, he died of congestive heart failure anyway.

 

It turns out that the use of stents is an obsolete paradigm used throughout the medical world, but nowhere as voraciously as in the US. Such a dangerous operation (1% die) can cost upwards of $40,000 and does little more than the placebo.

 

This example helps us to understand why the absurd Big Bang Theory has been so tenacious. Its reign coincided with the initiation of the US empire after World War II and its subsequent dominance in all things scientific and religious ever since. Financing for the “Last Creation Myth” found great support among the citizens and their representatives.[1] Einstein and his surreptitious religious suppositions received great acceptance. Those who misinterpreted data correctly “always found Einstein to be right again.”

 

Those who received heavy financial support were the decision makers, the peer reviewers. They were in charge of deciding who could be admitted to the paradigmatic cult. Criticize Einstein? Out. Don’t believe the universe was 4-D and could explode out of nothing? Out. Make up “wormholes” supporting the paradigm? In. Imagine strings with only one dimension? In. Think regressive physics and cosmogony are irrational? Out. As in the stent fiasco: Follow the money:

 

Why Use $tents When They Don’t Work?

 

The Big Bang paradigm is no different. Despite 10,000 dissidents opposed to relativity and/or the Big Bang Theory[2] and 25 falsifications[3] it is still hanging in there. The notorious photos from the James Webb Space Telescope show that the hypothesized “younging of the universe over distance” never occurred. When will they ever learn?

 

There are some clues. The current decline of the US empire has led to a decline in science funding, following historical precedent.[4] Even NASA, a big promoter of the Big Bang Theory, has not escaped the knife. Big-name universities, primary guardians of the paradigm, likewise are due to suffer. Perhaps a little house cleaning will get rid of some of the irrationality that plagues today’s regressive physics and cosmogony. Don’t hold your breath.  

 

 

PSI Blog 20250505

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! Get your copy of the just-released Second Edition of "The Scientific Worldview" to see the step-by-step logic leading to the rational view of the cosmos. Be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution,” the demise of the “Last Creation Myth,” and the age of enlightenment to come. Buy Now.

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 160 p. [ https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk ]

 

[2] de Climont, Jean, 2020, The Worldwide List of Alternative Theories and Critics, Editions d' Assailly, 2679 p. [ http://go.glennborchardt.com/declimont16dissidentlist ].

 

 [3] https://gborc.com/bbtfals

  

[4] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/do-declining-empires-lose-leadership-in-science-26aabc71f45c