"Creation" via Destruction of the Unfit

 PSI Blog 20251020 "Creation" via Destruction of the Unfit

 

Thanks to Maximiliano Echeverri for this prompt:

“In attempting to answer, Leibniz lost control and arrived at his famous thesis usually seen like 'this (created) world is the best of all possible worlds'.

“Microcosms in motion. Note that large microcosm A in the center shelters microcosm B from impacts from the left. Consequently, B will be pushed toward A, with the likelihood it might even end up rotating around A.” (Infinite Universe Theory, Figure 47).

Science is perhaps more at home with the question 'How?' than 'Why?'. Motives are neither interesting nor relevant in the field of the physical sciences.”

[GB: Actually, the “How?” and the “Why?” are identical with regard to evolution. Remember, the universal mechanism of evolution is univironmental determinism (what happens to a portion of the universe depends on the infinite matter in motion within and without). Darwin’s original mechanism was “natural selection,” which eventually was shown to be a macrocosmic mistake. In other words, like environmental determinism, it over emphasized the macrocosm—the outsides of things and neglected the insides of things. (Things are the XYZ portions of the universe I call microcosms). The insides of biological microcosms had to be included as well—genetics, to get Neo-Darwinism. Although genes did not comprise the complete insides of the biological microcosm, Neo-Darwinism was a step in the right direction. The word “univironment” includes all things, and thus is an improvement on Neo-Darwinism in biology as well. Genes were a good start, but the biological microcosm contains other innumerable submicrocosms that often are equally important. For instance, the knowledge encapsulated in our brains, our muscle memories, etc. are parts of our “univironment” that contribute to our journey through life.

 

Destruction of the Unfit

 

Normally, we think of evolution as “survival of the fittest.” I suggest turning that upside down to confront Leibniz’s “perfectly created” (best of all worlds) head-on. First of all, nothing survives for long. Even the dinosaurs only lasted 165 million years. Every microcosm within the Infinite Universe has a beginning and ending described in general by the Sixth Assumption of Science, complementarity (All things are subject to convergence and divergence from other things). We all experience this. We are a product of sexual convergence and eventually suffer the divergence of body parts as we age per the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

 

Second of all, with everything in the Infinite Universe moving with respect to other things, no microcosms (things) and no macrocosms (environments) remain unchanged for long. We are born into a particular environment, but that environment is sure to change. We may “fit” our environment one moment and be “unfit” in the next.

 

As we learned from the formation of ordinary matter from aether particles, the “fit” that occasionally occurs is the result of protection afforded small particles by large ones (Figure). The shelter that results in material complexes would never occur if all aether particles were identical as erroneously suggested for atoms by Democritus. Per the Ninth Assumption of Science, relativism (All things have characteristics that make them similar to all other things as well as characteristics that make them dissimilar to all other things) imperfection makes the existence of matter possible. In this most fundamental case, being “fit” means receiving fewer impacts from the side facing the large particle. All the other aether particles colliding endlessly with each other must be regarded as “unfit” for the making of ordinary matter. Once formed, the aether complexes become larger and increasingly complicated as “gravitational” impacts from free-ranging aether particles push additional aether particles toward those complexes.

 

What we see here as fundamental in the micro-world applies also to the macro-world. All cosmic bodies are a result of aetherial impacts that push electrons, positrons, neutrons, protons, and myriad particles toward one another. What we see as gravitation is merely a continuation of this process with its effectiveness guided by the number of aether particles previously accumulated as mass in Newton’s equation. Eventually, we have hydrogen atoms being pushed together to form helium in the sun. The pushing together (fusion) causes a further decrease in the motion of the atoms involved. This decrease in motion is released into the aether medium whereupon it produces waves that eventually warm the surroundings, notably including Earth.

 

The upshot is that “creation” amounts to the slowing down of aether particles in the form of material complexes we observe as ordinary matter. Again, much of that “lost” motion is transferred to the macrocosm, generally as the acceleration of portions of the macrocosm (especially of the aether medium as the motion we call “radiation”). We might consider those aether particles insufficiently slowed down as being “unfit,” while those resulting in aether complexes as being “fit.” Another upshot is the inevitable growth of these complexes, with the ever-increasing complexity seen in all the microcosms around us. As they grow, they can shield ever more of those “unfit” aether particles, making them evermore “fit.” Again, this process becomes evermore obvious in the macro world. Humans seek shelter from the onslaughts of the macrocosm, not only from the vagaries of the weather, but also from those produced by interspecies competition.

 

Given this natural transformation of one kind of matter into another kind of matter, the “How?” and “Why?” become one and the same. The great mind suggested by the “Why?” does not, and need not exist. Remember that the complete absence of matter (nonexistence or nothingness) is imaginary, an idealization that cannot possibly occur. That would be a violation of the Tenth Assumption of Science, interconnection (All things are interconnected, that is, between any two objects exist other objects that transmit matter and motion). The opposing religious assumption is the Tenth Assumption of Religion, disconnection          (There may be perfectly empty space between any two objects). That is necessary for the religious idea of the creation of something from nothing. Einstein provided the foundation of the Big Bang Theory when he denied the presence of aether, based on the erroneous interpretation of the Michelson-Morley Experiment. Denying aether, he substituted perfectly empty space instead. His “Untired Light Theory” reigns supreme to this day, as does the Big Bang Theory itself.]

 

 

PSI Blog 20251020

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! Get your copy of the just-released Second Edition of "The Scientific Worldview" to see the step-by-step logic leading to the rational view of the cosmos. Be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution,” the demise of the “Last Creation Myth,” and the age of enlightenment to come. Buy Now.