The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20090909

Does Energy Have Mass?

›
PSI Blog 20090909 Does Energy Have Mass? Bill: Glad you are enjoying www.scientificphilosophy.com and TTAOS (Borchardt, 2004). I hope you we...
10 comments:
20090904

Elderly Galaxy Disproves Big Bang Theory

›
PSI Blog 20090904 Elderly Galaxy Disproves Big Bang Theory Contradictions of the Big Bang Theory gather steam with each new discovery. Recen...
5 comments:
20090828

Letter in Support of an NPA Member

›
Mr. Douglas, Managing Editor, Evening Times This letter is in reference to Joe and his work on relativity. Joe is one of many dissident scie...
20090814

Infinity or Determinism?

›
Dear Glenn, After a prolonged absence, I opened Vagabond’s Communication Page (May June issue) www.vagabondpages.com/may09/communication.ht...
4 comments:
20090805

How do you tell the difference between correct ideas and incorrect ideas?

›
Test them in the external world through observation and experiment. Thus, Einstein’s “gedanken ‘experiment’” (i.e. “thought ‘experiment’”) i...
20090730

Why Univironmental Determinism is "One-sided"

›
Your philosophy seems too one-sided to me. Why don't you have a more balanced viewpoint? To obtain public funds, philosophy departments ...
20090722

Needs and the Principle of Least Effort

›
Dr. Borchardt: If I understand correctly, in TSW you describe a need (in the univironmental context) as something that is achieved with th...
1 comment:
20090715

Does Philosophy Make You a Better Scientist?

›
This question was asked recently by Sean on the Discover Magazine website. The 85 comments that ensued may be taken as a small, but relevant...
20090709

Why do you use the term "scientific philosophy" instead of "philosophy of science"?

›
Traditionally, the philosophy of science is studied and taught by philosophers, not working scientists. I know hundreds of scientists, but f...
20090702

What is the meaning of curiosity in scientific attitude?

›
PSI Blog 20090702 What is the meaning of curiosity in scientific attitude? Results from the James Webb Space Telescope are products of human...
6 comments:
20090624

Accommodationism and Why Evolution is True

›
This was a comment for Jerry Coyne, who just published the book, Why Evolution is True. His post was on accommodationism, which, like Christ...
20090616

The Big Bang Never Happened

›
Randall Meyer's excellent documentary "Universe: The Cosmology Quest" is now available on YouTube: https://go.glennborchardt...
1 comment:
20090608

Solipsism and Energy

›
The solipsism surrounding the energy concept was there at the beginning, before Einstein, of course. To escape the solipsism underlying rela...
20090521

Theory Formulation

›
PSI Blog 20090521 Theory Formulation The question has been asked: In what way is theory formulated? 1. Theory formulation begins wit...
8 comments:
20090515

INFINITIES

›
Further comment on INFINITY from Frederic Frees: Dear Dr. Borchardt: Faced with our apparent limitations, I continue to read (in dismay) the...
5 comments:
20090506

The Physical Meaning of E=mc2

›
Here is the abstract that I just wrote for the 2009, 16th Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference, Storrs, CT, United States Although Einstei...
3 comments:
20090503

Scientisms

›
From Rick Dutkiewicz: Dr. Glenn, I couldn't help but think of you when I read this quote. It made me smile a bit, and I thought that I s...
20090403

Proving a Negative

›
Dear Dr. Borchardt: When I read the mountain of literature assailing the validity of materialism, the one thing they all seem to have in...
20090328

Time as a Dimension?

›
A reader asks: Dear Dr. Borchardt: In TSW, you make it clear that we live in a three-dimensional universe. In fact, it is the only possible...
20090305

Consciousness

›
Dr. Borchardt: In TSW, you describe consciousness as matter in motion (i.e., what the brain does ). This makes perfect se...
20090225

Best Blog Debate of 2007

›
By popular demand, this is a repeat of my October 24, 2007 blog entry ("Big Bang Theory, Creationism, Deloria, and Capra") and the...
1 comment:
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.