The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20120509

Aethereal Redshift

›
David asks: Does the prediction of redshift nullify the "expansion" interpretation for the big bang? In other words, is it a...
20120502

Two Major Errors in Philosophy

›
William Westmiller writes: Your Socratic Method is amusing, but it's not a rational discussion that seeks to arrive at the truth...
20120418

Unmitigated Determinism

›
William Westmiller writes: I don't recall where our last discussion of free will ended, but I vaguely recall describing my view as ...
3 comments:
20120411

Why do satellites stay in orbit?

›
Henk writes: Glenn, thanks for the reply. What about satellites circling around the earth? They don't fall to the earth. Why is aether ...
2 comments:
20120404

Is the Speed of Light Constant?

›
William writes: There seems to be a great deal of consternation in the physics community  about the possibility that CERN detected neutr...
20120328

The God Particle Exists, or Maybe Not

›
Thanks to Carl for this link: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ thetwo-way/2012/03/07/ 148158529/scientists-say- theyve-cornered-the-elusive- god...
1 comment:
20120321

Why is Potential Energy So Hard to Understand?

›
Henk writes: Glenn, thanks for your answers. I read the introduction to physics at high school over here that my granddaughter has to rea...
3 comments:
20120317

Why is Velocity Squared?

›
PSI Blog 20120317  Why is Velocity Squared? From henk: Glenn, thanks for your answers. I am still thinking about kinetic energy. In the...
4 comments:
20120309

No Identities in Nature

›
William Westmiller writes: In a message dated 2/15/2012 7:09:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, noreply@blogger.com  writes: “...there are ne...
2 comments:
20120222

Learn Your Assumptions

›
A recent forum had this interesting statement: "I find the whole discusson (sic) about the assumptions of science to be at best cogniti...
20120215

Nothing, Finity, and Magnetic Fields

›
Andrew: Thanks for the comment: “Infinity is a process that is not yet finished. There are no infinities in nature. So, the universe must ...
20120125

Mass and Temperature

›
Bob de Hilster writes to NPA members: I have long thought that mass did not change with velocity. Until I find a physical cause that expl...
4 comments:
20120118

Censorship in Regressive Physics

›
PSI Blog 20120118 Censorship in Regressive Physics As expected, we have had some recent negative critiques by various modern physicists o...
20120111

Perpetual Motion Machines

›
Thanks to Marty Samson for the link to the perpetual perpetual motion machine debate at: ( http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/54128-continuo...
20120104

Scientism: Swear Words in the Philosophical Struggle

›
Scientism, defined as the belief that science is the only way to true knowledge, is in the Internet news again ( http://whyevolutionistrue....
2 comments:
20111228

Great Letter from a Student Disgusted with Modern Physics

›
This is a letter from a former physics student who switched to philosophy. He is responding to an email that Steve sent announcing our new ...
20111221

Infinity and Definition of a Point

›
From Nathan Carlson, a reader of my first paper on IUT ( http://scientificphilosophy.com/Downloads/IUT.pdf ): Mr. Borchardt, I was readin...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.