The Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it “revolutionary,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent,” “fascinating,” and even “a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding.” There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20120627

Snake Handling and the Big Bang Theory

›
The vast reservoir of indeterminism is deep, as shown in this Washington Post article on the death of Pastor Wolford via snakebite. I betc...
1 comment:
20120620

Dutkiewicz Blasts Krauss Interview on “A Universe from Nothing”

›
Blog 20120620 Last week’s Blog highlighted an interview with “renowned cosmologist,” Lawrence Krauss, a professor at Arizona State, concer...
6 comments:
20120613

Big Bang Apologetics and Mainstream Confusion Over Nothing

›
Thanks to Fred Frees for this email to the Universal Cycle Theory group: The article below is from eSkeptic ( a newsletter of the Skep...
20120530

Why There is No Gravitational Aberration

›
Bob writes: Glenn Since you bring up aberration, I have two questions 1. Is there a definition for the aberration of gravity? ...
20120524

Neomechanical Gravitation Theory

›
Our landmark paper on “Neomechanical Gravitation Theory” has just been posted on the Natural Philosophy Alliance website: Borchardt, G...
2 comments:
20120523

Why Dark Energy Does Not Exist

›
I have differences with a colleague over the term “energy.” He believes energy to be equivalent to motion and considers our differences to...
20120516

Why Belief in Evolution is so Low in the US

›
Jerry Coyne, one of my new heroes, is by no means a univironmental determinist, but he is an excellent determinist, conventional neo-Dar...
20120509

Aethereal Redshift

›
David asks: Does the prediction of redshift nullify the "expansion" interpretation for the big bang? In other words, is it a...
20120502

Two Major Errors in Philosophy

›
William Westmiller writes: Your Socratic Method is amusing, but it's not a rational discussion that seeks to arrive at the truth...
20120418

Unmitigated Determinism

›
William Westmiller writes: I don't recall where our last discussion of free will ended, but I vaguely recall describing my view as ...
3 comments:
20120411

Why do satellites stay in orbit?

›
Henk writes: Glenn, thanks for the reply. What about satellites circling around the earth? They don't fall to the earth. Why is aether ...
2 comments:
20120404

Is the Speed of Light Constant?

›
William writes: There seems to be a great deal of consternation in the physics community  about the possibility that CERN detected neutr...
20120328

The God Particle Exists, or Maybe Not

›
Thanks to Carl for this link: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ thetwo-way/2012/03/07/ 148158529/scientists-say- theyve-cornered-the-elusive- god...
1 comment:
20120321

Why is Potential Energy So Hard to Understand?

›
Henk writes: Glenn, thanks for your answers. I read the introduction to physics at high school over here that my granddaughter has to rea...
3 comments:
20120317

Why is Velocity Squared?

›
PSI Blog 20120317  Why is Velocity Squared? From henk: Glenn, thanks for your answers. I am still thinking about kinetic energy. In the...
4 comments:
20120309

No Identities in Nature

›
William Westmiller writes: In a message dated 2/15/2012 7:09:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, noreply@blogger.com  writes: “...there are ne...
2 comments:
20120222

Learn Your Assumptions

›
A recent forum had this interesting statement: "I find the whole discusson (sic) about the assumptions of science to be at best cogniti...
20120215

Nothing, Finity, and Magnetic Fields

›
Andrew: Thanks for the comment: “Infinity is a process that is not yet finished. There are no infinities in nature. So, the universe must ...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Glenn Borchardt
I have over 60 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.