20120524

Neomechanical Gravitation Theory


Our landmark paper on “Neomechanical Gravitation Theory” has just been posted on the Natural Philosophy Alliance website:

Borchardt, Glenn, and Puetz, S.J., 2012, Neomechanical gravitation theory ( http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6529.pdf ), in Volk, Greg, ed., Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, 19th Conference of the NPA, 25-28 July: Albuquerque, NM, Natural Philosophy Alliance, Eagan, MN,  v. 9.

In addition to being a summary of NGT derived from the details in "Universal Cycle Theory" (www.universalcycletheory.com), it contains a bit more on the fundamentals of the formation of baryonic matter from aether. It also formally introduces our new term: “aethereal redshift.” We would appreciate hearing of any typos or logical errors before it goes to press on June 1.

2 comments:

Glenn Borchardt said...

From Bill:

Good article. Of course, I agree that energy is nothing more nor less than matter in motion.

I think the nomenclature of "modern" physics is terribly deceptive, although most physicists will usually claim that the words are technically correct. Others with a "spiritual bent" like the implication of the words, which suggest "disembodied power".

The term "dark energy" is simply a substitute for the visible effects of invisible "gravitons", which must be matter in motion to cause the effects it does. The term "dark matter" simply refers to matter that doesn't emit or reflect light and therefore its motion can't be detected. The distinction between the two is just that "dark energy" produces evident gravitational effects, whereas the remainder of "dark matter" does not.

If pressed, I think most physicists would agree that "dark energy" IS some form of "dark matter" in motion.

Bill

Glenn Borchardt said...

Bill:

Whoops! Energy is not matter in motion. It is not the running dog; it is a description of the running dog--big difference.

Sorry, but "dark matter" is what produces the gravitational effects, not "dark energy," although it surely is misnamed. You are probably right that modern physicists think that energy is matter. It ain't.

Post a Comment

Thanks so much for your comment. Be sure to hit "Preview" to see if it will publish correctly. Then hit "Publish". Include your email address if you wish to receive copies of your comment as well as all other published comments to this Blog.

For those having trouble getting this comment section to work:

Nitecruzr writes:

[FAQ] Why can't people post comments on my blog?

The Blogger / Google login status, and the ability to post comments, is sensitive to both cookie and script filters. Your readers may need to enable (stop filtering) "third party cookies", in their browser and on their computer. The effects of the newly unavoidable CAPTCHA, and the Google "One account" login, requires third party cookies, even more than before.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/11/the-google-one-account-login-and-cookie.html

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/comments-and-cookie-filters-october-2014.html

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/10/the-new-commenting-captcha-is.html

Third party cookies filtering, in a browser setting, is the most common solution, overall - but your readers may have to search for other filter(s) that affect their use of Blogger / Google.

Any filters are subject to update, by the creator. If the problem started a few days ago, your readers may have to look on their computers, and find out what product or accessory was updated, a few days ago.

http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2014/01/almost-nobody-controls-their-own.html