20230116

List of Falsifications of the Big Bang Theory

PSI Blog 20230116 List of Falsifications of the Big Bang Theory

 

Here I present 19 reasons the “Last Creation Myth” cannot possibly be true.

 

Falsifications provide contrary evidence disproving or at least questioning a theory.[1] Because the universe is infinite, a correct theory cannot be completely proven, although it can be supported by evidence gathered from the external world. It takes only one falsification to disprove a theory, but as you can see, the list disproving the Big Bang Theory is long. There are many reasons for its tenacity, with proponents either ignoring the contradictions or inventing ad hocs, which are special pleadings that attempt to bypass a particular falsification. Many of these are based on violations of The Ten Assumptions of Science.[2]

 The overthrow of a paradigm must begin with an evaluation of its fundamental assumptions.

 

1.                The Big Bang Theory claims the universe exploded out of nothing. That is in violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics, which properly states matter and the motion of matter can be neither created nor destroyed.[3]

2.                The assumed explosion of the universe out of nothing has no physical cause. The claimed “dark energy,” is a calculation; dark energy does not exist.[4]

3.                The Big Bang Theory predicts that we should observe only young cosmological objects at great distances. Instead, we see elderly galaxies and galaxy clusters at the limit of observation, which now is almost 13.8 billion light years away—the assumed age of the universe.[5]

4.                The Doppler effect, once considered responsible for the cosmological redshift and the interpretation that most galaxies are receding from us, only occurs in a medium. Einstein’s corpuscular theory of light, denies the presence of a medium.[6]

5.                At cosmological redshifts greater than z=1.5 the assumed galactic "recession" velocities based on the Doppler effect are greater than the velocity of light. Nothing travels at greater than the speed of light.[7]

6.                The greater than c recession velocities are now interpreted instead as the result of space expansion, which supposedly carries the galaxies along with it at greater than cThere is no evidence that perfectly empty space can expand all by itself.

7.                Because the imagined explosion of the universe either from the creationist’s “perfectly empty space” or from Hawking’s “singularity” would have no diversification it would produce a homogenous universe per the Cosmological Principle of Big Bang Theory. The universe is heterogenous, with the view in every direction being unique as predicted by Infinite Universe Theory.[8]

8.                Universal expansion theory requires massless light particles traveling perpetually through perfectly empty space. Massless particles and perfectly empty space have never been found.[9]

9.                Cosmogonists assume a spiral galaxy near the limit of observation formed within 450 million years after the Big Bang. That is a fantastic ad hoc in view of the fact it took our own Milky Way 13.6 billion years to form.[10]

10.           Cosmogonists predicted the Cosmic Microwave Background would be about 10oK. It is 2.7oK.[11]

11.           The predicted “Heat Death of the Universe” assumes the universe is finite and isolated. The opposing assumption, infinity, implies neither is true.[12]

12.           Cosmogonists assume the cosmological redshift indicates the universe is expanding. The cosmological redshift simply indicates light waves lose energy over distance like everything else.[13]

13.           Galaxies and other cosmic bodies are converging. True explosions involve only divergence.[14]

14.           Galaxy clusters and superclusters have been shown to have developing nuclei. That means they must be much older than any single galaxy they contain.[15]

15.           The galactic nucleus (black hole) in the center is only 1% of the mass of our 13.6-billion-year-old Milky Way. It would take trillions of years for its 400 billion stars to be pushed into the nucleus to form a “naked black hole.”[16]

16.           The recent discovery of naked black holes without stars implies they are the end-stage nuclei of former galaxies. These could not have formed during the mere 13.8 billion years ascribed to the Big Bang universe.[17]

17.           Cosmogonists assume the lack of a physical origin point for the universe means it is 4-dimensional. This assumes time to be a dimension, which it is not; time is motion and does not have dimensions.[18]

18.           Big Bang Theorists surreptitiously assume finity. The correct assumption is infinity, with over 20 trillion galaxies in the observable universe suggesting the universe cannot expand because it is already full.[19]

19.           Cosmogonists who propagate the “Last Creation Myth” assume there was nothing before the universe exploded out of perfectly empty space. The very existence of the universe implies that nonexistence, the perfectly empty space imagined by the idealist, is impossible.[20]

 

Einstein’s “Untired Light Theory” is the assumed foundation for universal expansion. That theory, too, had eight ad hocs contradicting Sagnac’s evidence light was a wave and not a particle.[21] Without those ad hocs, cosmogonists would have been less likely to entertain the notion light was a massless particle filled with perfectly empty space traveling perpetually through perfectly empty space.

 

The Untired Light Theory and the Big Bang Theory are highly popular with almost daily propaganda being spread among gullible folks amenable to religious indoctrination. The continued success of those theories is based on the religious opposites of fundamental scientific assumptions. The first falsification above presents this starkly. Conservation (The Fifth Assumption of Science) has been a stalwart of science since 1850. It is a seldom recognized direct contradiction of its religious opposite: creation. If cosmologists really were scientific, there would be no Big Bang Theory.

 

The list above is by no means exhaustive. I invite others to contribute additional falsifications I am not aware of. You or your nom de plume will receive proper credit. Please remember that falsifications involve solid undisputed evidence and interpretations thereof based on The Ten Assumptions of Science. The numerous questions (e.g., What came before?), paradoxes (e.g., Light both a wave and a particle?), contradictions (e.g., Time is a dimension?), and fantastic speculations (e.g., Wormholes?) engendered by the Big Bang Theory make it highly suspect, but those are not necessarily falsifications.

 




[1] http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2021/11/infinity-and-falsification-of-big-bang.html

 

[2] Borchardt, Glenn, 2004, The Ten Assumptions of Science: Toward a New Scientific Worldview: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 125 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/ttaos-amazon] or [https://go.glennborchardt.com/TTAOSfreepdf]. [Note that any challenge to an erroneous paradigm must begin by uncovering the erroneous fundamental assumptions upon which it is based. Cosmogonists are unqualified to do this because, by definition, they begin with today’s most significant erroneous assumption: finity.]

 

[3] This is usually called the conservation of “energy,” with energy being a calculation that attempts to combine matter and motion, which is not possible. Energy is a matter-motion term, which simply tries to describe matter in motion.

 

[4] “Dark Energy” is matterless motion, and thus posits no physical cause for the explosion of the universe out of nothing. See: https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/does-energy-have-mass-68d84c72cbc

 

[5] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/shocking-news-webb-confirms-infinite-universe-theory-87e504dcd8e2

https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/shocking-news-ii-infinite-universe-theory-confirmed-by-galaxy-where-only-stars-were-predicted-by-34a5cb8bd8cb

https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/jwst-photos-of-4-265-high-redshift-galaxies-show-no-younging-of-the-universe-87323c9323d8

https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/shocking-news-iii-450-million-year-old-spiral-galaxy-falsifies-the-big-bang-theory-a06b27065867

https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/shocking-news-iv-diversity-of-distant-galaxies-similar-to-local-galaxies-as-predicted-by-infinite-9d536d7bd876

 

[6] Borchardt, Glenn, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 160 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk]

 

[7] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/why-the-big-bang-universe-can-never-be-older-than-13-8-billion-years-bbb48b4f5e19 [Also explains why redshifts greater than z = 1.5 would indicate recession velocities greater than the speed of light.]

 

[8] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/shocking-news-iv-diversity-of-distant-galaxies-similar-to-local-galaxies-as-predicted-by-infinite-9d536d7bd876

 

[9] Borchardt, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity.

 

[10] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/shocking-news-iii-450-million-year-old-spiral-galaxy-falsifies-the-big-bang-theory-a06b27065867

 

[11] Assis, A.K.T., and Neves, M.C.D., 1995, History of the 2.7 K temperature prior to Penzias and Wilson: Apeiron, v. 2, no. 3, p. 79-84. [We test theories by comparing predictions with the evidence. This was a clear case of a predictive failure of the Big Bang Theory, with some of the predictions of opponents subsequently being supported by the evidence. There are many such technical details similarly ignored by cosmogonists.]

 

[12] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/front-stage-at-the-end-of-the-universe-trope-dedd42a5d814

 

[13] Borchardt, Glenn, 2017, Infinite Universe Theory: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, Ch. 7. [http://go.glennborchardt.com/IUTebook].

 

[14] Ibid. Ch. 2.

 

[15] Ibid. Ch. 3

 

[16] Puetz, S.J., and Borchardt, Glenn, 2011, Universal Cycle Theory: Neomechanics of the Hierarchically Infinite Universe: Denver, Outskirts Press, p. 185. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/UCT].

 

[17] http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2020/05/psiblog-20200518-elderly-black-hole-in.html

 

[18] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/time-is-motion-1cb1d47a0e78

 

[19] Siegel, Ethan, 2020, This Is How We Know There Are Two Trillion Galaxies in the Universe: Starts with a Bang! Accessed Dec 22 [https://go.glennborchardt.com/2-trillion]. [Recent photos from the James Webb Space Telescope have ten times the resolution of the ones used in this essay.]

 

[20] Borchardt, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity.

 

[21] Borchardt, 2017, Infinite Universe Theory, Table 6.

 

You also can read this on Medium.com, where this list of falsifications of the Big Bang Theory will be updated in the future: 



https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/f5097445a5bf?source=friends_link&sk=e259a7c7891dbeb5292567f39a57885c

 

 

No comments: