Blog 20160518 Will
relativity ever be discredited?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Bryant
Some established scientists don’t appreciate it when people question the prevailing
theories and leading scientific ideas. In fact, when asked if relativity
theory will ever be discredited, a leading scientist laughs and says that “it
will never be discredited.” (See: https://youtu.be/msZ790rgN7g ). Fortunately, that is NOT
how all scientists think, nor is it how science works. I've met a lot of
scientists at universities who are open to conversations that challenge the
prevailing ideas.
This same scientist (mentioned earlier) sent a “tweet” today that read: “A
skeptic will question claims, then embrace the evidence. A denier will
question claims, then reject the evidence.” This position is incomplete.
There are actually four states that have to do with the acceptance or rejection
of old and new information. A Denier will reject old and new information.
Deniers do not follow sound mathematical or scientific processes. Many people
who call themselves "Dissidents" are actually Deniers. A Dissident
will reject old and accept new information. Sometimes the new information is
valid, sometimes it is not. But Dissidents tend to reject part or all of the
old information. A Skeptic accepts old information, but tends to reject new
information, especially new information that challenges a belief that he or
she holds. The last group are Scientists. A Scientist will accept old
information (and set it in the proper context) and is open to accepting new,
well–supported mathematical and scientific information. Many people who call
themselves scientists today are actually skeptics.
No scientific theory or idea should ever be elevated to the point where it
can no longer be questioned. Doing so moves that theory or idea from science,
into the realm of religion.
So, what is our charge? What is the role of the next generation of
scientists? The main goal is to listen and to think. Not to memorize and
parrot back. If something doesn’t make sense, perhaps there’s something
wrong. Don't just accept it. Find out what's wrong. Perhaps we can't see it,
but eventually we'll find it. It may take years (or in the case of relativity
theory, a century), but eventually we'll find it. And when we do, science
must adapt and eventually accept it. Yes, it won't be easy because denial is
a human's favorite defense mechanism. But eventually the disciplined science,
math, and rational ideas will prevail.
Therein is our challenge: to be champions of change; to support those ideas
that make mathematical, scientific and rational sense; and to challenge those
that do not. Glenn’s work will be one of the foundational pillars of rational
scientific thought as we return to an era of disciplined science, an era where
it is ok to question everything, an era where it’s ok to ask “Why?”
--------------------------------------------------
Steven Bryant is the author of DISRUPTIVE: Rewriting the rules of
physics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment