PSI Blog 20170308 Time Crystals and Complementarity
Readers familiar with the Sixth Assumption of Science, complementarity (All things are
subject to divergence and convergence from other things) and the Second Law of
Thermodynamics may be interested in a recent break-through dubbed “time
crystals.”
FIONA MACDONALD at
Science Alert puts it this way:
Constant motion without
energy.
That last bit has been corrected:
“Update 31 January 2017: We had previously
compared the constant oscillation of the time crystals as being in perpetual
motion at ground state, which isn't accurate. We've now corrected this
explanation.”
Actually, I was hoping to get some crystallized time so
I can get my new book “Infinite Universe Theory” done some time this century. Oh
well, at least we don't have to suffer yet another transgression of the Fourth Assumption of Science, inseparability (Just as there is no motion without
matter, so there is no matter without motion). While energy neither exists nor
occurs, it still is a useful calculation. I am also glad that this really is
not about motion without energy. I don’t quite know what to make of the claim
that this is “one of the first examples of non-equilibrium matter.” What would
really be surprising would be to discover an example of “equilibrium matter."
With all microcosms in the universe moving with respect to all other microcosms,
nothing is truly in equilibrium. All matter is “non-equilibrium matter,” just
as all reactions are irreversible.
Any confusion about this study stems from the vagaries
of systems philosophy. If one totally ignores the macrocosm (environment) of the
particular microcosm being studied, there are bound to be some surprising
results. Be reminded that the macrocosm contains a veritable zoo of
supermicrocosmic particles. Any time an experiment verges on discovering a violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, rest assured
that some factor in the macrocosm has been ignored when it should not have
been.
Per the Fifth Assumption of Science, conservation
(Matter and the motion of matter can be neither created nor destroyed) no
microcosm can exhibit an increase in motion without having received it from
somewhere else.
No comments:
Post a Comment