PSI Blog 20210118 Another
regressive absurdity: “Fragments of energy”
Readers know that, by
definition, regressive physicists and cosmogonists do not know what energy is. In
particular, they have trouble with their definitions. In progressive physics,
we define matter as an XYZ portion of the universe containing other matter
within and without. Energy is like other matter-motion terms. Energy neither
exists, nor occurs. What exists is matter and what occurs is the motion of
matter. Today’s absurdity is an excellent example of the misuse of our
ever-useful matter-motion terms. Their use requires at least a smidgeon of
scientific philosophy, although primitive philosophy is sufficient. All
languages have nouns (describing portions of the universe) and verbs
(describing what those portions do).
The cosmogonical mess below
arrives to us via the most important generally unacknowledged assumption
underlying cosmogony: that the universe had an origin. The “fundamental building block” idea, of course, also is
based on the regressive assumption of finity (The universe is finite in the microscopic and
macroscopic directions).
At least the “fragments of
energy” idea is consupponible with the “Dark Energy” ad hoc used to save the Big
Bang Theory. Cosmogonists, like better grounded scientists, had the sneaking
suspicion that the explosion out of nothing or even out of the earlier “singularity”
ad hoc would not cut it. There had to be some driving force (other than an
imaginary god) to initiate that grandiosity. Because energy, whether considered
light or dark, really does not exist, its “fragmentation” was bound to be the imagined
solution to the microcosmic end of the finity assumption as well.
A prominent energy
calculation is via Maxwell’s E=mc2. Obviously, if m=0, then E must
also equal 0. There can be no energy without mass, just as there can be no
particle without mass. But the Dark Energy of the cosmogonists hypothesizes no
particle that could be the carrier of the force (F=ma) that could propel the
universe into existence. Similarly, the magical objectification of energy conceived
as being neither a particle nor a wave is simply mathematical nonsense at best.
Energy calculations are absolutely essential in physics, but we must never
forget that the calculation must always be of matter in
motion and motion of matter. The article below shows how far off base
regressive physics and cosmogony can get. With incorrect assumptions, the math
is GIGO (Garbage In; Garbage Out). Read it and weep!
Fragments of energy – not waves or particles – may be the
fundamental building blocks of the universe
https://go.glennborchardt.com/E-fragments
Wow! Silverberg replaces ancient Greek, Newtonian, Young (et al.), and Einsteinian theories about how the Universe works without ever having to define what his "energy fragments" are (and gets paid for the effort)! ... Amazing!
ReplyDelete