Cause of the motion of aether particles

PSI Blog 20210628 Cause of the motion of aether particles

 

This week’s book prize goes once again to Abhishek Chakravartty for another good question:

 

“You wrote that per the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the entropy of each wave would be less than the previous. Some of the motion of the particles would be lost to the environment which, in the case of light, must consist of progenitor aether-2 particles magnitudes smaller than the aether-1 particles directly responsible for light transmission. Can you explain how the motion of aether-1 particles consists of aether-2 particles?”

 

[GB: Abhi, in Infinite Universe Theory all things are assumed to consist of other things ad infinitum. For this assumption to work, scale is irrelevant. In “Universal Cycle Theory”[1] Steve and I speculated that, while baryonic (ordinary) matter is formed from aether particles, the hierarchical nature of the Infinite Universe requires even smaller microcosms to form the constituents of aether. Aether would be a benefactor of an infinite series. For that discussion we renamed “aether” as aether-1, with it having formed from aether-2, which had to be formed from aether-3, and so on… That is a corollary from the Tenth Assumption of Science, interconnection (All things are interconnected, that is, between any two objects exist other objects that transmit matter and motion). Note that aether-2, like all the other intervening microcosms, provides little resistance to the motion of larger microcosms in the infinite hierarchy, often giving “support” to the perfectly empty space assumption of Einstein’s Untired Light Theory and the Big Bang Theory.

 

Later,[2] I realized that aether particles probably were vortices because: 1) the formation of matter requires vortex motion, which develops when constituents vary in size per relativism (Figure), 2) vortices are common throughout the Infinite Universe at all scales, 3) vortex structure would result in the T-waves that dominate light motion.

  

“Hypothetical aether particles showing the effects of vortex morphology” (Borchardt, 2017, figure 49).

 

Not shown in the figure are the aether-2 particles, which like the aether-1 particles, cannot be seen by us baryonically formed microcosms. I imagine the aether-2 particles form from aether-3 particles in the same way baryonic matter forms from aether-1 particles. Each of these vortices accretes their constituents in the same way the solar system and the Milky Way does. Per the Sixth Assumption of Science, complementarity (All things are subject to divergence and convergence from other things) these eventually will dissipate like all other microcosms, to be replaced by new ones formed in similar ways. Note that no one has proposed a “structure” for Einstein’s imaginary photons aside from the wave-particle oxymoron. Photons are massless and thus can have no constituents. Remember that the impacts attributed to photons (e.g., the photoelectric effect) must be due to local aether particles in the same way local nitrogen molecules impact your ear drums.

 

The motions of the submicrocosms (constituents) within a microcosm serve to preserve its structure. For instance, without the impacts of the helium atoms on the insides of the balloon it could not exist as an inflated balloon.

 

In Infinite Universe Theory the motion of aether-1particles does not result from its containing aether-2 particles. The motion of a particular microcosm is primarily the result of impacts from other microcosms per “univironmental determinism” (what happens to a portion of the universe depends on the infinite matter within and without). For instance, the motion of a helium balloon depends on the macrocosm (environment) in which it exists. In the atmosphere, the pressure beneath it is greater than above it. The impacts from nitrogen molecules beneath it are more numerous and more active than those above it. Note there is no religious “first cause” because there is always yet another microcosm in the Infinite Universe to do the job. The opposing finity assumption is the religious foundation of the ever-popular Big Bang Theory, which is the last gasp of creationism.]

---

[1] Puetz, S.J., and Borchardt, Glenn, 2011, Universal Cycle Theory: Neomechanics of the Hierarchically Infinite Universe: Denver, Outskirts Press, 626 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/UCT].

[2] Borchardt, Glenn, 2017, Infinite Universe Theory: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 337 p. [http://go.glennborchardt.com/IUTebook].