Water pressure vs aether pressure

 PSI Blog 20210830 Water pressure vs aether pressure

 

Abhi asks:

 

“It has always been observed that objects with densities greater than that of water sink in water and objects with densities less than that of water float on water. This means that water has a tendency to push objects with densities greater than itself towards the baryonic matter on which the water is placed and also a tendency to push objects with densities less than itself away from the baryonic matter on which the water is placed. Can you explain why water has such tendencies?”

 

[GB: Thanks, Abhi for an easy one. Remember that the direction a microcosm (i.e., “object”) moves is determined by the univironment. In this case, we can be concerned mostly with the macrocosm, that is, the supermicrocosms that tend to collide with a particular microcosm. The heavy object is pushed toward the center of Earth by highly active water molecules and aether particles. The light object is pushed toward the surface of the water by highly active, massive water molecules that produce collisions whose F=ma is greater than the F=ma of the countervailing collisions produced by tiny aether particles.

 

Another way of looking at this phenomenon is with Newton’s First Law of Motion. A microcosm is accelerated when a supermicrocosm collides with it; and decelerated when that microcosm collides with another supermicrocosm. This may appear a bit complicated because the pressure in water (baryonic matter) increases toward Earth because it is pushed toward Earth by highly active aether particles during gravitation. The pressure in the aether medium increases away from Earth as we surmised in our explanation of the Pound-Rebka experiment.[1] EM waves moving away from Earth traveled faster than those traveling toward Earth. Because of the slightly increased velocity, the waves were redshifted (further apart).[2] This implies short-range aether particle motion was greater as well. Having higher velocities means the force (F=ma) engendered by each particle was greater also, revealing that aetherial pressure increased with distance from Earth (collisions per cm²). Once those aether particles collide with baryonic matter, they decelerate, producing a low-pressure halo containing “dark matter” around baryonic matter.[3] This is both a result of gravitation and a cause for further gravitation since all microcosms tend to move from high to low pressure areas.

 

Baryonic matter, which is simply complexed aether particles, moves similarly, but with the more massive microcosms crowding out the less massive ones. Many types of wood and other “lighter” microcosms are no match for heavy water molecules. These provide more force to their Earthward sides, causing them to float despite the relatively meagre impacts of the nitrogen, oxygen, and aether particles above them.

 

I like this explanation because it removes the contradiction posed by Newton’s gravitational attraction hypothesis. One could naively ask: If everything is “pulled” toward Earth, how come the wooden object floating on the water is not pulled likewise. You also could ask Einstein why his perfectly empty space-time doesn’t do a better job on the wooden object.]   

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn, and Puetz, S.J., 2012, Neomechanical gravitation theory, in Volk, Greg, Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, 19th Conference of the NPA, 25-28 July: Albuquerque, NM, Natural Philosophy Alliance, Mt. Airy, MD, v. 9, p. 53-58 [10.13140/RG.2.1.3991.0483].

[2] Note that Pound and Rebka used the old “time dilation” trope to explain this. Time is motion and cannot dilate.

[3] Borchardt, Glenn, 2018, The Physical Cause of Gravitation: viXra:1806.0165.