20220826

Washington Post Recognizes Webb’s Challenge to the Big Bang Theory

PSI Blog 20220826 Washington Post Recognizes Webb’s Challenge to the Big Bang Theory  

Infinite Universe Theory Gets Its First Boost from The Mainstream

 

In 1971 Scott-Heron famously proclaimed “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.” Today, I am not so sure about that. When the establishment fires a shot across the bow of a paradigm as strong as the Big Bang Theory, we should take note. For the public, this is only the beginning of the end of the Last Creation Theory and its erroneous assumption the universe had a beginning. Cosmogonists, those who unthinkingly use that assumption, will be under continual attack until the absurd Big Bang Theory finally crumbles. Like the public recognition that the climate is warming, the story won’t go away. [GB: For the rest of this essay please click on: https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/washington-post-recognizes-webbs-challenge-to-the-big-bang-theory-80c407acc184?sk=920b83c1d6d811455d8bc91bc7b9d437 ]

1 comment:

George Coyne said...

In 1925 Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin discovered that hydrogen and helium were the main constituents of stars, but because her results disagreed with the orthodox view, for her Ph.D. thesis to be accepted she was required to call her results 'spurious." For the full story read the sub-section titled "Thesis" at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecilia_Payne-Gaposchkin

The situation is not any better today for those whose study results do not conform to accepted beliefs. Big bang theorists are casting doubt on what the JWST has revealed. The Washington Post article quotes astronomer Dan Coe of the Space Telescope Science Institute: "The easiest explanation for those surprisingly massive galaxies is that, at least for some of them, there’s been a miscalculation — perhaps due to a trick of light...But dust can be throwing off the calculations. Dust can absorb blue light, and redden the object. It could be that some of these very distant, highly red-shifted galaxies are just very dusty, and not actually as far away (and as “young”) as they appear. That would realign the observations with what astronomers expected.