20221017

First Alteration of an Asteroid Orbit a Huge Success for Humanity and Infinite Universe Theory

 

PSI Blog 20221017 First Alteration of an Asteroid Orbit a Huge Success for Humanity and Infinite Universe Theory

 

Another instance of Einstein’s relativity being left in the dust by NASA’s Newtonian Mechanics

 


Figure 1. The 170-m wide Dimorphos just before the collision. Credit: NASA.

 

Readers know I have been outrageously critical of relativity because of the religious assumptions hidden beneath all the math (see especially "Religious Roots of Relativity"). The universe does not work that way—everything simply is matter in motion, as implied by Newton’s three laws. While some of NASA’s experiments have been erroneously interpreted as though they support Einstein, DART is not one of them.

 

NASA’s great achievement demonstrated that it is possible to send a rocket over 10 million kilometers to collide with and alter the orbit of another cosmological object. In this first instance, the orbit of a small asteroid (Dimorphos) was decreased as it continued to revolve around a large asteroid (Didymos). Jerry Coyne and his friend Jim Batterson do a great job explaining the DART experiment: https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2022/10/12/the-dart-mission-was-a-success-orbit-perturbed/. Jerry includes a link to the hour-long video of the presser and one on the 39 secs preceding the collision. The upshot, as Jim writes, is that “the orbit of Dimorphos around Didymos changed significantly - from 11hrs 55min to 11hrs 23min – a 32 minute change.”

 

This provides an educational moment for us:

 

Relativism


Take a look at Dimorphos in Figure 1. Note the irregular shapes and sizes of the rock fragments of which it is composed. This is typical of the Infinite Universe, with this observation providing support for the Ninth Assumption of Science, relativism (All things have characteristics that make them similar to all other things as well as characteristics that make them dissimilar to all other things). In my lectures, I sometimes ask students to find two identical rocks or pebbles, which would be a falsification of relativism. They never do. It also is why we say “no two snowflakes are identical” and why so-called “identical twins” are never completely identical. Regressives tend to assume the opposite, the Ninth Assumption of Religion. I call that absolutism (Identities exist, that is, any two things may have identical characteristics). That is when I get out my hand lens or microscope. If you look hard enough you always will find some dissimilarities.

 

Rocket Science

 

Figure 2. “Illustration of how DART's impact altered the orbit of Dimorphos about Didymos.” Credit: DART Mission Team.

 

Note that DART is moving in the opposite direction of Dimorphos. This means the head-on collision resulted in a deceleration of Dimorphos, causing its velocity to decrease. That follows from Newton's Second Law of Motion in which the motion of the collider decreases as the motion of the collidee increases. Of course, in this case, the imparted motion subtracts from that of DART. When the velocity of a satellite decreases, it enters a lower orbit. That is, it is pushed toward the object it revolves around due to gravitation. Despite the decrease in velocity, the trip around Didymos became shorter, with its period of revolution decreasing by the 32 minutes.

 

Imagine what would have happened if DART was able to travel in the same direction as Dimorphos. If it had a higher velocity than Dimorphos, it might be able to catchup with and collide with it. This would have increased the velocity of Dimorphos per Newton's Second and cause an increase in the length of its orbit. The period of revolution would then increase instead of decrease.

 

Here is a great cartoon illustrating how rockets can change orbit by speeding up or slowing down by reversing thrust direction. Again, all this has to do solely with Newtonian mechanics, the same theoretical physics that got us to the Moon, Mars, and beyond—no “relativists” need apply.

 

Vortex Formation

 

As Steve Puetz and I pointed out in our technical book “Universal Cycle Theory,” vortices are common throughout the cosmos.[1] Vortex formation is why smaller bodies revolve around larger ones, with the Dimorphos-Didymos system being a good example (Figure 2). The orbits of revolving bodies tend to decay over time for the same reason Dimorphos’s orbit just did: deceleration. The Infinite Universe always contains something that gets in the way. There is no perfectly empty space that would allow perpetual motion. That is one reason I changed Newton’s First Law of Motion from “unless” to “until” in "The Scientific Worldview."[2] It is one reason the subtitle of that book is “Beyond Newton and Einstein.”

 

Orbital decay like that shown in the DART experiment is why Earth has an iron-nickel core denser than the siliceous crust. It is why stars in spiral galaxies like the Milky Way end up being pushed toward its extremely dense nucleus. It is why, once that part of the evolutionary process is completed, the results could be called “naked black holes.” Evidence for these starless nuclei is accumulating rapidly as I write, with each one attesting to the validity of Infinite Universe Theory.

 

In “Universal Cycle Theory” we speculated that it would take trillions of years for the Milky Way to reach that state. We based this on the analogy to our solar system, in which about 99% of the mass is centered in the Sun. The nucleus of the Milky Way, has only 1% of its mass. Even so, cosmologists generally assume the Sun will shine for at least another 4 billion years, with its eventual remnants taking billions more to reach the nucleus of the galaxy.


[1] Puetz, S.J., and Borchardt, Glenn, 2011, Universal Cycle Theory: Neomechanics of the Hierarchically Infinite Universe: Denver, Outskirts Press, 626 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/UCT].

 [2] Borchardt, Glenn, 2007, The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 411 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/TSW].

 

To read this and its updates on Medium, click here.

 

On Medium.com you can read more than three essays monthly by joining for $5/month.

Half of your membership fee supports the endowment of the Progressive Science Foundation, which will continue advancing Infinite Universe Theory as the ultimate replacement of the Big Bang Theory. You’ll also get full access to every story on Medium. Just click here.

 

When on Medium, you can clap a lot of times to aid the foundation, follow me, and subscribe to get these weekly essays directly in your inbox. 

No comments: