Huge Spiral Galaxies Confirmed as Falsifications of the Big Bang Theory

PSI Blog 20230227 Huge Spiral Galaxies Confirmed as Falsifications of the Big Bang Theory

 

James Webb Space Telescope continues to provide cognitive dissonance for cosmogonists.

Andromeda, a nearby spiral galaxy like the ones seen by the James Webb Space Telescope at the assumed “beginning of the universe” almost 13.8 billion light years away. Andromeda has an estimated one trillion stars. Photo credit: NASA.

 

Thanks to George Coyne for this email:

 

Your readers would most likely enjoy hearing about how the latest images from the JWST contradict the Big Bang Theory:

 

"The space observatory revealed six massive galaxies that existed between 500 million and 700 million years after the big bang that created the universe. The discovery is completely upending existing theories about the origins of galaxies, according to a new study published Wednesday in the journal Nature.

 

"These objects are way more massive than anyone expected,” said study coauthor Joel Leja, assistant professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Penn State University, in a statement. “We expected only to find tiny, young, baby galaxies at this point in time, but we’ve discovered galaxies as mature as our own in what was previously understood to be the dawn of the universe.

 

The amount of mass we discovered means that the known mass in stars at this period of our universe is up to 100 times greater than we had previously thought."

 

What I found most amusing in this article is the statement: "The galaxies are so massive that they conflict with 99% of models representing early galaxies in the universe, which means scientists need to rethink how galaxies formed and evolved." Rather than coming to the obvious conclusion that the discovery falsifies the BBT, the supporters of this ridiculous theory decided that their long-standing knowledge of star formation must be wrong. That conclusion indicates that these astronomers need to develop some critical thinking skills.

 

Webb telescope makes a surprising galactic discovery in the distant universe

 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/world/webb-telescope-massive-early-galaxies-scn/index.html

 

[GB: Of course, this was not a surprise to promoters of Infinite Universe Theory as the ultimate replacement for the current absurdity. Progressive scientists are always happy to provide predictions that inevitably will come true.]

Eric Lerner on “The Big Bang Never Happened”

PSI Blog 20230220 Eric Lerner on “The Big Bang Never Happened”

 

Debate between a long-time “subversive” opponent and “distinguished” cosmogonist Claudia Maraston

 

                 Claudia Maraston and Eric Lerner

 

Eric is best known for his 30-year-old book supporting plasma cosmology as an alternative to the Big Bang Theory:

 

Lerner, E.J., 1992, The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe: New York, Vintage Books, 440 p.[1]

 

Among his admirable assertions in that book was that the universe was infinite in extent and infinite in time. As one can imagine, cosmogonists (those who assume the universe had a beginning) were highly critical.

 

I reviewed one critique, which was presented by theoretical physicist Victor Stenger in “Skeptical Inquirer.” It turned out that the Inquirer should have been more skeptical of one of their favorite sons. Stenger’s review is replete with errors that I pointed out along with a few made by Lerner:

 

https://scientificphilosophy.org/Downloads/Stenger1992%20antiplasma%20universe-GB%20review.pdf

 

Here is the debate between Lerner and Maraston:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqtFlKQO2FQ

 

---

[1] Lerner’s book mentions “plasma” 432 times and “infinite” only 198 times. Although he mentions infinity more than most reformers, his overemphasis on a single microcosmic type (plasma) lacks the generality necessary for the correct version of Infinite Universe Theory. For instance, Eric nonetheless assumes the Sixth Assumption of Religion, noncomplementarity        (All things are subject to divergence from all other things). That assumption would not be the way to begin an attack on the universal expansion trope. Furthermore, he would not be able to resolve the SLT-Order paradox (see: Borchardt, Glenn, 2008, Resolution of the SLT-order paradox, Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance: Albuquerque, NM, v. 5 [10.13140/RG.2.1.1413.7768].)

 

  

Nine-year Old Genius Calls Out Cosmogonist Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Falsity of the Big Bang Theory

PSI Blog 20230208 Nine-year Old Genius Calls Out Cosmogonist Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Falsity of the Big Bang Theory

 

This kid is about to enter college knowing the Big Bang Theory violates the First Law of Thermodynamics.

 

David Balogun

 

Thanks to Sahil Gupta via A Cosmology Group who gave us this heads up:

 

https://youtu.be/gBPumrQlN58

 

Be sure to look at 6:42 where David Balogun refutes the Big Bang Theory by mentioning the first of our 19 falsifications of the theory:

 

https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/list-of-falsifications-of-the-big-bang-theory-f5097445a5bf

 

 

“1. The Big Bang Theory claims the universe exploded out of nothing. That is in violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics, which properly states matter and the motion of matter can be neither created nor destroyed.”

 

What great fun poking holes in the current astrophysical mess? Even a child can do it by getting some words in edgewise. DeGrasse ultimately seems flustered, reverting to the usual demand for proof although there is no proof for matter having been created out of nothing. The Big Bang is all just a fantasy.

 

It is so refreshing to see a genius who actually exhibits common sense instead of the philosophical muddle Einstein and Hawking left us with.

 

We wish David well in his quest to become an astrophysicist and join the Last Cosmological Revolution. Let us hope he is strong enough to resist the university deprogramming he probably will be forced to endure.