PSI Blog 20230424 Death Throes of the Big Bang Theory-JWST Keeps
Finding Galaxies That Shouldn’t Exist
Paradigms: The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
Spiral galaxy. Credit: Yahoo! Finance.
Folks not in the business of cosmogony look askance at the
silly claims of the Big Bang Theory. Although its absurdities are obvious to
outsiders, that is not true for those financially dependent or formerly
dependent on the paradigm.
Remember that, according to Kuhn[1], a
paradigm is more than just a theory. It includes all the publications based
upon it, which include all the interpretations based upon the fundamental
assumptions underlying the theory. It includes all the paraphernalia used to
justify those interpretations. The longer a false theory exists, the greater
the number of accoutrements it gathers. The Big Bang Theory is the biggest of
them all, for it is a theory about all that exists.
Thanks to George Coyne for the heads up on reporter Andrew
Griffin’s recent article charting the demise of the Big Bang Theory:
James
Webb Space Telescope keeps finding galaxies that shouldn’t exist, scientist
warns
Here is a quote that sums up the conundrum:
“Professor Boylan-Kolchin’s paper, ‘Stress testing ΛCDM with
high-redshift galaxy candidates’, has been published in Nature Astronomy this
week.
It suggests that the information from the JWST proposes a
profound dilemma for scientists. The data indicates that there might be
something wrong with the dark energy and cold dark matter paradigm, or ΛCDM,
that has been guiding cosmology for decades.
Usually, galaxies convert around 10 per cent of their gas
into stars. But the newly discovered galaxies would have to be converting
almost the entirety of it into stars.
That is theoretically possible. But it is a departure from
what scientists would ever have expected.
Further observation of the galaxies should better clarify
their ages and masses. It might show that the observations are incorrect: that
supermassive black holes at their centre are heating the galaxies up, so they
look more massive than they are, or that they are actually from a later time
than expected but look older because of imaging problems.
But if they are confirmed, then astronomers may have to
change their understanding of the cosmos and how galaxies grow, to adjust their
model to account for the unusually large and mature galaxies.”
The Other Shoe Prediction
We
predicted there is yet another shoe to drop on the properties of these
“elderly galaxies”: the discovery of heavy elements that have been recycled
from large stars that take billions of years to develop the required pressures.
Many of these eventually become neutron stars, whose collisions
end up scattering heavy elements throughout the galaxy. Soon we will be
hearing about those heavy elements causing additional puzzlements for
cosmogonists looking at spectra from the farthest galaxies.
As always, the mainstream papers and summaries tend to
present the contradictory data and some speed-up ad hocs, without mentioning
any hint that the Big Bang Theory is done for and must be replaced by Infinite Universe Theory.
To read this and its updates on Medium, click here.
On Medium.com you can read more than three essays monthly
by joining for $5/month.
Half of your membership fee supports the endowment of the
Progressive Science Foundation, which will continue advancing Infinite Universe
Theory as the ultimate replacement of the Big Bang Theory. You’ll also get full
access to every story on Medium. Just click here.
When on Medium, you can clap a lot of times to aid the
foundation, follow me, and subscribe to get these weekly essays directly in
your inbox.
[1]
Kuhn, T.S., 1996, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.): Chicago,
University of Chicago Press, 212 p.
2 comments:
The latest research in the link shows the Milky Way Galaxay to be 13 billion years old."In a new paper published Wednesday in the journal Nature, astronomers Maosheng Xiang and Hans-Walter Rix of the Max-Planck Institute for Astronomy used a survey of nearly a quarter of a million stars to clock the development of the Milky Way, taking advantage of existing knowledge of stellar lifecycles to better understand the longer galactic lifecycle.
The spiral disk of the Milky Way can be split into two populations, the thin, inner disk of younger stars, of which our Sun belongs, and a thick disk, somewhat older stars that extend further out from the plane of the galactic spiral. Surrounding the galaxy overall is also the halo, a sparse population of older stars.
Xiang and Six found that the thick disk likely began forming around 13 billion years ago, or 800 million years after the Big Bang, while the inner galactic halo formed around two billion years later. The assembly of the inner halo took place through ancient Milky Way’s merger with the Gaia-Enceladus galaxy, a dwarf galaxy that mostly merged with our galaxy between 8 and 11 billion years ago.m the "So Xiang and Six used the data from the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fibre Spectroscopic Telescope (Lamost) in China, and the European Space Agency’s Global Astrometric Interferometer for Astrophysics (Gaia) spacecraft to survey 247,104 subgiant stars ranging in age from 15. Billion to 13.8 billion years old."
The author does not explain how there can be 15 billion-year-old stars when the hypothesized Big Bang occurred less than 13.8 billion years ago.
An important point to emphasize is that galaxies being discovered by the JWST within a few hundred million years post the supposed Big Bang are estimated to be as mature as our 13 billion-year-old Milky Way. Because the light from these newfound galaxies took about 13.5 billion years to reach us that would make them about 26 billion years old in a universe that the Big Bangers claim in under 13.8 billion years. It would appear that the Big Bang theorists are severely lacking in basic arithmetic skills. The only logical conclusion is that the JWST images have completely falsified this ridiculous theory.
Here is the link: https://www.independent.co.uk/space/milky-way-galaxy-galaxies-stars-b2042313.html
Thanks so much George. Looks like the universe is getting older and more infinite by the minute. 15 billion years! Egads!
Also, I like your math better than the expanding space calculation.
Post a Comment