20230403

Earliest galaxies challenge ideas about star birth in imaginary infant universe

 PSI Blog 20230403 Earliest galaxies challenge ideas about star birth in imaginary infant universe

 

Even Science, the journal I subscribed to for over half a century, is nervous about the coming demise of the Big Bang Theory.

 

“Within Pandora’s Cluster, the JWST space telescope has spotted a few galaxies from the early universe. NASA; ESA; CSA; IVO LABBE/SWINBURNE; RACHEL BEZANSON/UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH; ALYSSA PAGAN/STSCI”

 

Cosmogonists (those who assume the universe had a beginning) cling to their “Last Creation Myth” despite all the evidence piling up indicating the universe is infinite. Even so, the estimate that over 20 trillion galaxies exploded out of nothing has not phased believers very much. Now, even this mainstream journal reflects the beginning of the end for the most ridiculous of theories:

 

Earliest galaxies challenge ideas about star birth in infant universe

 

“Discoveries by giant new space telescope JWST are getting too big for theorists to ignore.”

 

Author Daniel Clery concludes that the paradigm is just too big to fail:

 

‘Few want to countenance an even more extreme option: that the LCDM [current version of the Big Bang] model is at fault. It could be tweaked to produce more dark matter halos or larger ones able to concentrate gas more quickly into bigger galaxies. But theorists are loath to tinker with it because it explains so many things so well: the observed distribution of galaxies, the abundances of primordial gases, and the accelerating expansion of the universe. “We’d be at risk of screwing everything else up,” Ferrara says. “You’d need to be pretty desperate.”’

 

Of course, the desperation has always been there. Remember, I listed 20 falsifications (disproofs) of the Big Bang Theory. It is a fact that the distribution of galaxies show no expansion whatsoever, much less an accelerating one. The cosmogonists still are “loath to reject” the confirmation bias engendered by Bishop LemaĆ®tre’s explosive conjecture in 1929.

 

 

No comments: