Regressive Physics

PSI Blog 20230612 Regressive Physics

 

How so-called “modern physics” took theoretical physics backward and brought forth the Big Bang Theory.

 

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

 Regressive physics is what I define as the indeterministic version of physics otherwise known as “modern physics.” It stems from the radical 20th-century departure from determinism that became popular after Einstein’s invention of Special Relativity Theory in 1905 which still has a solid grip on the discipline despite being plagued by numerous paradoxes and contradictions in the interpretation. Practitioners are heavily financed and allowed to publish outlandish deductions and wild speculations as long as they do not contradict relativity and cosmogony. Among these are the absurdities of massless particles, immaterial fields, wormholes, multiverses, space-time, and fabrications such as string theory that claim anywhere between one and 26 dimensions. Regressive physicists generally do not know what time is and that time cannot dilate. They believe that momentum, force, energy, and space-time actually exist, and that aether does not. Most do not know the proper interpretation of Maxwell’s E=mc² equation. Regressives unthinkingly accept Einstein's Untired Light Theory and the resulting interpretation that the universe is expanding and had a beginning via explosion from nothing.

 

Today, almost all gainfully employed physicists appear to be regressive, with dissenters having been forced out long ago through various forms of scientific censorship. The regression began in response to the deterministic ravages of classical mechanism and dialectical materialism during the late 19^th century (Darwin, Marx, etc.). In particular, Lenin’s “Materialism” and the rise of communism put the fear of god into the west. Relativity’s immaterialistic assumptions and paradoxes fit in with the religious dreams and imaginings of the day. Einstein prepared the way for the belief in universal expansion, with the good priest Lemaître suggesting Hubble’s redshifts meant that the entire universe exploded from a “cosmic egg” in tune with Genesis. To get popular, all ideas, theories, papers, and books must fit the macrocosm in which they exist. Each theory acts as a weapon in the philosophical struggle between determinism and indeterminism, which continually involves spiralic progress through education and regress through miseducation.

 

When first introduced, the absurdities in Special Relativity Theory and General Relativity Theory brought forth numerous complaints, but these were dismissed in favor of the financial rewards available to supporters of Einstein’s theories. When viewed with indeterministic eyes, falsifications of relativity were ignored, while so-called confirmations were revered. Opponents usually were dismissed as “cranks” or “crackpots” no matter how logical their arguments may have been. What makes relativity so tenacious is its preponderance of einsteinisms. That is what we now call predictions that are correct, but for the wrong reasons. For instance, how could starlight pass through Sun’s atmosphere without being refracted and thus bent toward the sun? Is refraction really proof for curved space-time?

 

All this amounts to the “crisis in physics” evident to those able to rub two neurons together since 1905. It is time to give up the magical thinking and insist on including actual “physics” in our interpretations. Despite all the imaginary hocus-pocus, the reality still is that the universe works via matter colliding with matter as put forth in Newton's Second Law of Motion.

 

To read this and its updates on Medium, just click here.

 

On Medium.com you can read more than three essays monthly by joining for $5/month.

 

Half of your membership fee supports the endowment of the Progressive Science Foundation, which will continue advancing Infinite Universe Theory as the ultimate replacement of the Big Bang Theory. You’ll also get full access to every story on Medium. Just click  here.

 

When on Medium, you can clap 50 times to aid the foundation, follow me, and subscribe to get these weekly essays directly in your inbox.