Latest False Big Bang Theory Ad Hoc

 PSI Blog 20240325 Latest False Big Bang Theory Ad Hoc

 

Rare cosmogonist proposes universe is 27 billion years old and without “Dark Matter.”

 

Photo Credit: Eric Ralls.

 

Study: Dark matter does not exist and the universe is 27 billion years old

 

Thanks to George Coyne and Jesse Witwer for pointing out this controversial study from Adjunct Professor Rajendra Gupta of the Physics Department at the University of Ottawa. You can read the open access report here. It is filled with the usual complicated math that is required for publication in physics and cosmology. Instead, I will critique a few quotes from Eric Ralls who wrote the highlighted review of Gupta’s theory:

 

“Gupta’s innovative approach involves the integration of two theoretical models: the covarying coupling constants (CCC) and “tired light” (TL), known together as the CCC+TL model. This model explores the notion that the forces of nature diminish over cosmic time…”

 

[GB: Sorry, but the “forces of nature” do not diminish over time. That generalization only would apply to a finite universe. While each portion of the Infinite Universe evolves, the Infinite Universe itself does not evolve as I explained here.]

 

“‘The study’s findings confirm our previous work, which suggested that the universe is 26.7 billion years old, negating the necessity for dark matter’s existence,’ Gupta explains.”

 

[GB: The 26.7 Ga value simply is about twice the 13.8 Ga promoted by mainstream cosmogonists. This reform makes sense because telescope views in opposite directions assume 13.8 is correct. If so, the distance E-W or S-N must be 27.6 billion light years. Sorry, but a change in age has nothing to do with whether or not “Dark Matter” exists. It is quite naïve to assume everything in the Infinite Universe must be luminous.]

 

“‘Contrary to standard cosmological theories where the accelerated expansion of the universe is attributed to dark energy, our findings indicate that this expansion is due to the weakening forces of nature, not dark energy,’ he continued.”

 

[GB: As I have pointed out many times, energy, whether “dark” or “light,” does not exist—it is simply a calculation of matter in motion. The dark energy that supposedly drives the expansion of the universe has no matter associated with it—least of all dark matter. The evidence for dark matter is well established as reporter Ralls mentions and is explained for rotating galaxies in this nice review by Vera Rubin.[1]]

 

“‘Tired Light’ (TL) Model

 

On the other hand, the “Tired Light” model offers a radical explanation for the redshift observed in light from distant galaxies. Instead of attributing this redshift to the expansion of the universe, as the Big Bang theory does, the TL model suggests that light loses energy — and thus shifts towards the red end of the spectrum — as it travels through space. This energy loss could be due to interactions with particles or fields, causing light to ‘tire’ over vast distances.”

 

[GB: Another important aspect of Gupta’s reform attempt is his inclusion of Tired Light Theory as explained above by Ralls and supported by Hubble himself. Remember that the whole expanding universe misinterpretation is based on Einstein’s false assumption light was a massless particle containing perfectly empty space traveling perpetually through perfectly empty space.[2] None of that exists, and one has to be philosophically naïve to believe it does. Eventually, the exact mechanism by which light waves lose energy over distance will be known. My own view is that perfect reproduction of subsequent waves is impossible, even for the highly elastic aether particles that exist in the aether medium. You only have to drop a pebble in calm water to prove this for yourself.]

 

“In summary, the CCC+TL model represents a bold crossroads between two unconventional theories, offering a fresh perspective on the workings of the cosmos.”

 

[GB: I don’t think so!]

 

 

PSI Blog 20240325

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.”  There you can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your questions.

---

[1] Rubin, V.C., 2000, One hundred years of rotating galaxies: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, v. 112, p. 747-750. [10.1086/316573].

 

[2] Borchardt, Glenn, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 160 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk]