Natural and “Artificial” Evolution

PSI Blog 20240513 Natural and “Artificial” Evolution

 

Understanding the universal mechanism of evolution—univironmental determinism.

EVOLUTION

OF

EVERYTHING

 

Anon writes:

 

“Thank you:) I am very excited to see my question on your blog and to see that climate change is worthy of integration of planetary change and the Infinite Universe Theory on your blog.  What effects will be seen on our planets in conjunction with IUT?”

 

[GB: Welcome. Always like to answer your questions.]

 

“One Question:

 

As a Geologist as an original profession, could the evidence of natural selection theorized by Darwin (who was also a Geologist) and Wallace be interpreted through artificial selection? 

 

Artificial Selection: Changes explained by natural selection however due to exogenous manipulation through a biased third party on a global scale (including weather patterns, tectonic shifts etc.) rather than coincidental events.”

 

[GB: Actually, my Ph.D. was in Soil Science with minors in geology and chemistry (Thesis was “Neutron activation analysis for correlating volcanic ash soils”).

 

Remember that the universal mechanism of evolution is univironmental determinism (what happens to a portion of the universe depends on the infinite matter in motion within and without).[1] Anything one deems “artificial,” “biased third party,” “coincidental,” or otherwise “exogenous manipulation” is included in univironmental determinism (UD). The Darwin-Wallace mechanism is called “neo-Darwinism,” but it is only a special case involving biology. It only includes their “natural selection” and Mendel’s genetics. Even so, I always thought it was quite naïve of folks who opposed evolution while partaking of its benefits. Where did they think all those wonderful dog breeds came from? Their ancestors (wolves) might be fine, but a bit too large and carnivorous for most tiny apartments. On the farm, we partake in evolution when we select the best cows and bulls for increasing milk production. Our race horses are bred from thoroughbreds that may have won races in the past.

 

Folks like to think they are “exogenous,” that is, outside of nature. Sorry about that, but we definitely are part of nature. Per UD, everything you see around you is “natural.” So, do we manipulate our surroundings? Of course. Does cementifying whole cities warm the climate within those cities? Of course. Do the oceans emit increased carbon dioxide when the climate becomes warmer? Of course.

 

Your question is definitely apropos to Infinite Universe Theory. The philosophy and mechanism (univironmental determinism) upon which it is based assumes the evolution (motion) of each XYZ portion of the universe is determined equally by the inside and outside of that portion. This means, of course, that the universe has to be both microcosmically and macrocosmically infinite.

 

By using UD I was able to discover the cause of gravitation and the production of the aetherosphere mentioned in the previous Medium.com posts. Also, it is the 10-yr anniversary of our highly cited paper on the cycles affecting Earth:

 

Puetz, S.J., Prokoph, Andreas, Borchardt, Glenn, and Mason, E.W., 2014, Evidence of synchronous, decadal to billion-year cycles in geological, genetic, and astronomical events: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, v. 62–63, no. 0, p. 55–75. [10.1016/j.chaos.2014.04.001].

 

Univironmental determinism brings us out of the myopism that has always afflicted humanity. It is opposed to the 20^th century scientific world view, systems philosophy, which tends to overemphasize “systems” while deemphasizing their environments. That is why the 300-year-old “attraction” theory continued into the 21^st century. It is why we are still plagued with its archetype: the Big Bang Theory, with its explosion of everything out of nothing. It is time we rejected the myopism that produced that silly idea. It is time to replace the Big Bang Theory with the Infinite Universe Theory.]

 

 

PSI Blog 20240513

 

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.”  There you can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your questions.

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn, 2007, The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 411 p. [https://gborc.com/TSW07].