I just received an invitation to become an indeterminist. Although I
normally turn these down rapidly and respectfully, I thought this one from reader
Frank Hatch was nevertheless quite instructive:
Invitation to Join an
Upgraded Species:
This is an invitation to functional individuals of a corrrupt species - i.e., the human species called, "Man." This invitation was originally offered by the first New Man or Son of Man, but it has since collected a swamp of clerical additions. However, after two thousand years, the invitation is still open. Indeed, in the moment before your death, the invitation will still be open to you.
Definitions for Functional and Non-Functional Individuals: http://www.FrankHatchiii.com/Invitation.html
Best Regards,
Frank Hatch
Initial Mass Displacements
This is an invitation to functional individuals of a corrrupt species - i.e., the human species called, "Man." This invitation was originally offered by the first New Man or Son of Man, but it has since collected a swamp of clerical additions. However, after two thousand years, the invitation is still open. Indeed, in the moment before your death, the invitation will still be open to you.
Definitions for Functional and Non-Functional Individuals: http://www.FrankHatchiii.com/Invitation.html
Best Regards,
Frank Hatch
Initial Mass Displacements
As you may have experienced,
we become univironmental determinists by adhering to certain fundamental
assumptions. If you took any science courses at all, you must have come across
the impression that “there are material causes for all effects” or that the
real world is made of matter, while the imagined world is not. Those statements
are enough to set off endless arguments settled on an individual basis only by
assumption. "The Ten Assumptions of Science" were discovered by
careful study with the use of these three requirements for fundamental
assumptions:
•
They always have opposites.
•
They never can be completely proven.
•
If more than one, they must be consupponible
(without contradiction).
I must admit that my 20
years living with indeterminism seemed to have been necessary for discovering
the most important oppositions. Frank is still living with it, as you can see.
I am glad to be included among his “functional individuals,” but I am quite
sure that I am not a member of a “corrupt species.” It is too bad that the
indeterministic baggage must also include general pessimism. I don’t know what
a “corrupt species” would look like. A lot of the world is “red in tooth and
claw,” as Darwin recognized. Univironmental determinism, the universal
mechanism of evolution, assumes that whatever happens to an xyz portion of the
universe is determined by the infinite matter in motion within and without.
With humanity experiencing the
latter part of its juvenile development, I suppose we could
label much of its activity as “corrupt.” I don’t find that particularly useful.
That is sort of like the rabbit complaining about the fox instead of running
away. We can whine about the human condition all we want, dreaming about how
things should be, but there is nothing like getting our hands dirty doing something
about it. Signing up for indeterminism, even if it is just before the last
minute, is a copout and a complete waste of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment