PSI
Blog 20170531 Instill and enforce loyalty
We
all need to respect religion—or else. As I maintained over a decade ago when I
reviewed Dawkin’s “The God Delusion,”
the evolutionary purpose of religion is to instill and enforce loyalty.[1] Dawkins had failed to
emphasize this all-important factor, suggesting that religion was merely vestigial
in nature. Religion is vestigial alright, but it continues to dominate the
globe, with 90% of our 7.5 billion population being affected. Now comes a
much-needed book that mostly gets it right: Adam Wadi’s “Atheism For Muslims: A guide to questioning
Islam, religion and God for a better future.”
After much apologizing to his family, friends, and
an institution likely to take offense, Wadi gets on the right foot by telling
us that, in general “Religion creates this sense of belonging and purpose in
people with the goal to achieving one outcome: submission” (p. 27). He says
that the definition of “Islam” is “one who submits to God’s will” (p. 124). He
then goes through the Qur’an, using numerous quotations to demonstrate how
nearly every page instills and enforces loyalty in a way similar to a book that
made the scene 600 years earlier. Both holy books continually warn believers
and nonbelievers that they are to ignore the contradictions and to do as they
are told. Any criticism (blasphemy) or traitorous rejection (apostasy) is not
to be tolerated. Above all, believers are to be “god-fearing” in the same way
they are to fear the power of the King, Queen, or der Führer.
Loyalty makes a social group extremely powerful.
There is nothing like a couple, family, tribe, state, or nation that is on the
same page, defending its policies to the death, if necessary. In a world still
dominated by feudalism such loyalty remains critical in protecting against the
inevitable invaders. That is why capitalism also needs to harness religion for
its necessary expansion. Soldiers who do not expect to experience living after dying
are no match for those that do.
Wadi admits that he is unlikely to dissuade many of
his more tentative readers to atheism, particularly those facing the
possibility of severe punishment. Rather, he wishes to give hope to folks who
already are taking that path. In the spirit of a true educator, he has outlined
the reasons for belief as well as disbelief. He points out that both holy books
cagily provide believers with support for dreams that surely will come true if
they only follow orders properly. As Wadi says “After all, that’s all religion
is, people choosing the stories they most want to believe in whether they are
true or not.” “Eye for an eye” and “turn the other cheek” need not be a
contradiction. Just choose whichever suits the occasion.
I learned a lot about Islam from Adam’s explication.
For instance, I was unaware that much of the Qur’an was based on the old and
new testaments. I had always thought that the reformation started with Luther
five centuries ago, but it actually started with Muhammad nine centuries
earlier. The Qur’an claims to be complete, perfect, and unchangeable: “There is
no changing the words of God; that is the mighty triumph” (Qur’an 10:65). But
as in Protestantism, there have been many reforms. For example, the Sunni sect
forbids images of Muhammad (the last prophet), while the Shia sect often permits
them. There is no mention of the promised 72 virgins in the Qur’an (that is part
of a “reform” or interpretation called the Hadith). The Qur’an condemns
blasphemy, “but doesn’t specify a punishment for it in this life, only the next”
(p. 289). I
learned that Muhammad was a pacifist in Mecca and only became a militarist when
he moved to Medina. His popularity grew as a result, with growing populations
embracing its utility (i.e., “instill and enforce”) for expanding throughout
the world.
Wadi:
“If Islam is indeed true, you’d think its followers wouldn’t have to use fear
and intimidation so much to get children to practice it devoutly” (p. 226).
This
is the line he got while growing up Muslim:
“Here’s
the way it is. Everyone else is wrong. They’ll likely burn in Hell for not
following the rules, regardless of how good a person you think they are. This
is how it’s always been. So you should be fearful if you don’t believe it too.
Otherwise God will punish you and you’ll burn in Hell forever” (p. 226-7).
One
other quote is worth the price of the book:
"We
are not living in the most dangerous time in human history, we're living in the
most fear-mongering time in human history” (p. 43).
I
like that quote because it reflects Pinker’s data showing exactly that.[2] Fear-mongering is good for
sales, whether for anti-virus programs, alarm systems, or religion.
Here
are some other great quotes from the book:
“From
a scientific standpoint, human life has absolutely no meaning to it, regardless
of what any religion says.” “So, it’s not religion which gives
us meaning, it’s us that gives religion meaning” (p. 318).
“There’s
a myth that people who don’t have a religion have nothing to live for. But it’s
the opposite. We have nothing to die for. We have everything to live for.”
“Religion
and science have both given us opposite accounts of the world we live in.”
“I’m
quite conscious of the fact that you can’t reason people out of something they
didn’t reason themselves into.”
Not
everyone gets everything right. Here are some quotes not in tune with
univironmental determinism:[3]
“I
am agnostic when it comes to the belief of whether or not there is a higher
power out there…”
“We
all have the free will…”
He
gives an interesting, partially factual, 60-step description of the evolution
of the universe, without realizing that today’s cosmogony is religious.[4] Hubble did not discover
that the universe was expanding.[5] He merely observed that
cosmological redshifts correlated with distance. Wadi repeats the conventional
view that most of the universe consists of “dark energy.” Like most every
regressive physicist and cosmogonist, he does not realize that energy does not
exist—it is a calculation.
Despite
those few quibbles, “Atheism for Muslims” is a good read, especially if you
would like to find out what Islam and the Qur’an are all about.
[1]
https://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2007/07/evolution-of-religion.html?m=0omenon.
[2]
Pinker, Steven, 2011, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has
Declined: New York, Viking [http://stevenpinker.com/publications/better-angels-our-nature].
[3]
Borchardt, Glenn, 2007, The Scientific Worldview:
Beyond Newton and Einstein: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 411 p.
[http://www.scientificphilosophy.com/].
[4]
Borchardt, Glenn, 2017, Infinite Universe Theory (coming soon): Berkeley, CA,
Progressive Science Institute.
[5]
Sauvé, Vincent, 2016, Edwin Hubble... and the myth that he discovered an
expanding universe, Accessed 20161030 [http://tinyurl.com/j6txbl5].
1 comment:
Hello Mr. B,
Love the site. Have struggled with Eisteinian paradoxes for half my life and am enthralled at what you have put together here.
So far, I only have found one thing you haven't spoken to that I am aware of that doesn't line up or you haven't proposed a clear explanation for. What do you make of the latest so called detection of gravitational waves?
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40120680
Post a Comment