PSI Blog 20210809
Vera Rubin, Dark Matter and Nobels lost
Vera Rubin (1928-2016)
“Glenn,
A few days ago, I went through
your Quora page with great interest. Great job dealing with the good as well as
the bad questions. Thanks for that.
In one answer about dark matter,
you recommended a paper by Vera Rubin. I just now found time to read that short
“Millennium Essay" paper, “One Hundred
Years of Rotating Galaxies”.
What a great lady. I had to do
some further research on her career. Married for 60 years! …That type of
dedication and devotion is rare.
10-year-old Vera developed an
interest in astronomy while watching the stars from her window. "Even then
I was more interested in the question than in the answer,”
It’s so sad that scientists like
Vera were (and remain) hamstrung by the BBT and all of its related Ad Hocs (or
as Vera says, “adjectives"). She could have done so much more with a
better understanding of the infinite universe. I love her humility. She even
says, “I like a very old universe”. How much more would she have enjoyed
applying her expertise and open-mindedness to an infinite universe!
I especially love this quote from
her Millennium Essay.
"Models of enormous
complexity exist, which assume that luminous disks form embedded in cold
dark matter structures originating early in the universe. In order to make the
models fit, adjectives modify cold dark matter models: open,
mixed, tilted, ... I hope that new observations and new insights
will soon impose tighter constraints upon these models, as well as
tighter constraints upon the dark matter/bright matter components which
produce the observed rotation curves. Some of the current
complexity must arise from our ignorance.” [Emphasis mine.]
Wow! It would be nice to live
long enough to see some minds like Vera’s joining “our” fight. I know we have a
few coming our way, but it’s so dang slow happening. I guess we have to take a
Zen approach and accept what the universe gives us in return for our work.
Best regards,
Rick Doogie
Allegan, Michigan
Nice little video about Vera
Rubin. Ten minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ub37odWiufI
[GB: Thanks so much
Rick. Dark matter has been suspected for centuries before its discovery by
Fritz Zwicky in 1933, who found the masses of the galaxies in the Coma Cluster
were over 100 times greater than those calculated from their luminosities.
In the 1970’s Vera
Rubin and colleagues began studying the rotation rates of galaxies known to be
rotating. Conventional wisdom promulgated by followers of both Newton and
Einstein predicted rotation rates of stars within spiral galaxies would
diminish with distance (A), but Rubin found no such thing (B):
It is now estimated
that 85% of the mass in the observed universe consists of dark matter. To be
“light matter,” that is “luminous,” microcosms must first undergo high pressure
that forces their submicrocosms to converge. That is what happens when hydrogen
atoms are pushed together to form helium in the Sun resulting in heat and
light. Those special conditions are relatively rare in the Infinite
Universe, particularly when you consider the vast distances between cosmic
bodies. I suspect the 85% is a gross underestimate.
As I explained in Aether
Deceleration Theory[1], the
whole process of creation amounts to the slowing down of high-velocity aether
particles. At first, small aether particles are pushed by other aether
particles toward large aether particles where they are partly sheltered from
further impacts. Glancing blows then cause these smaller particles to revolve
around the larger ones, forming aether complexes. What was once linear motion
then becomes circular motion which, in effect, amounts to high-velocity
submicrocosmic motion at the same time as it amounts to relatively low-velocity
motion of the resulting microcosm (aetherial complex). When aetherial matter
forms large enough complexes, we observe them as baryonic (ordinary) matter. The
formation of the rest of the universal hierarchy continues similarly.
We experience the
same process when we observe gravitation. As is well known, gravitation is an
acceleration. As Newton taught, acceleration of one body always produces an
equivalent deceleration of the colliding body. This is where dark matter comes
in. All baryonic matter is subject to collisions from high-velocity aether
particles, resulting in the pushes we know as gravitation. The decelerated
aether particles tend to accumulate as a halo around each baryonic complex. In
effect, that is what Zwicky and Rubin had to hypothesize as “dark matter” in
explaining their results. The upshot is that the process of creation and
gravitation are one and the same. Both simply involve the deceleration and densification
of aetherial and baryonic matter.
Note that, despite
their ground-breaking discovery of dark matter, neither Zwicky nor Rubin and
her colleagues ever received a Nobel Prize. One does not receive that for proving Einstein wrong, only for proving him right, no
matter how contorted and misconstrued
the explanation. For instance, the discovery of a speed-of-light shock wave
recently dubbed a “gravitational wave” was awarded to the usual aether deniers in
a matter of months.]
1 comment:
Here is a lecture on dark matter by Sabine Hossenfelder. Although it is from a regressive point of view (e.g., "attraction", "space-time, etc.) she nicely illustrates some of the observations indicating its existence. Not sure if her support of the "superfluid" idea will fly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4sw3-__pGo
Post a Comment